What A Difference Twelve Minutes Makes On The Internet

ScreenHunter_6027 Jan. 13 09.22

 ScreenHunter_6026 Jan. 13 09.21

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to What A Difference Twelve Minutes Makes On The Internet

  1. Helly says:

    We should pay more attention to objective indicators. Like those indicating healthy amounts of TV watching.

  2. gator69 says:

    What a difference the internet makes. Thanks Al Gore!

  3. Michael 2 says:

    Good job. Now, millions of people have seen the cartoons whereas a week ago it was mere thousands.

  4. Gail Combs says:

    Now Fox news has put a face up as target.

    rah says:
    <a href="https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2015/01/12/seven-years-since-bom-announced-the-end-of-rain-in-australia/#comment-480836"January 13, 2015 at 3:01 pm

    February 1981. My SF team was tasked with training a Battalion of the now deactivated 11th Reserve Special Forces Group in winter warfare. Training took place at what was then Camp McCoy, WI (Now Fort McCoy). Reporter from a local paper wished to do a story on the training. Female reported came with photographer. We agreed as long as there were not photos of the faces of any team member taken. They violated the agreement and we physically took the camera and film from the photographer and exposed it all…..

    Those two examples made it very clear to me that the traditional US press is the enemy of every person in the US military, if they know it or not.

    Any news paper that prints the photograph of a person who is targeted by terrorists is aiding those terrorists. The US MSM does it all the time. Zimmerman and the cop in Fergusion are examples.

    Unfortunately when these people get their heads blown off as a result the photographers/reporters are NEVER held responsible.

    I can remember when the first airplane hijacking occurred. Mom said “That should never have been reported!” How right she was. We have been paying for that ‘freedom of speech’ ever since.

    • AZ1971 says:

      The “MSM” – and small, local newspapers or media outlets for that matter – aren’t really journalists any longer with integrity and moral fortitude to report the truth. Secondary education, i.e. college, no longer stresses the quest to do investigative reporting and to be non-political. Today, everything must be about what angle you’re coming from, and argument/counterargument AKA truth is de-emphasized. Right or left (primarily left) ideology of the media affiliates doesn’t matter: just move copy so they can remain profitable.

      Charles Kuralt is rolling over in his grave.

      It is understandable, however, from the perspective that since the 1980’s and the advent of cellular telephones and video games the population’s attention span has been ever shortened. Advertisers used to have ten seconds in which to capture a potential consumer’s attention; now it’s three. The media has limited time and space in which to make a case for the reader to keep reading and thus are forced to sensationalize their reporting. That wouldn’t be so bad if not for the fact that younger demographics are ill-equipped to think critically, be inquisitive, and do more than merely accept at face value whatever is being spoon-fed them by “news” organizations.

      There’s a reason why “low information voters” are no better than non-voters.

      • Gail Combs says:

        “…There’s a reason why “low information voters” are no better than non-voters.”

        Low information voters, those who make decisions based on headlines and emotions rather that thinking are much worse than non-voters. They are the ones that the Fabian/Progressive count on to wipe out the USA.

        link

        • rah says:

          “Low information voters, those who make decisions based on headlines and emotions rather that thinking are much worse than non-voters.”

          Dead on!

  5. Ben Vorlich says:

    This has puzzled me for a while, if images of Muhammad have been banned how do we know what he looks like?

    So I did a little research.
    So The Guardian says
    “To many Muslims, any image of the prophet Muhammad is sacrilegious, but the ban has not always been absolute and there is a small but rich tradition of devotional Islamic art going back more than seven centuries that does depict God’s messenger.

    It began with exquisite miniatures from the 13th century, scholars say. Commissioned from Muslim artists by the rich and powerful of their day, they show almost every episode of Muhammad’s life as recounted in the Qur’an and other texts, from birth to death and ascension into heaven.”

    and Wikipedia says
    “The permissibility of depictions of Muhammad, a prophet in the Islamic faith, has long been a concern in the religion’s history. Oral and written descriptions are readily accepted by all traditions of Islam, but there is disagreement about visual depictions.[1][2] The Quran does not explicitly forbid images of Muhammad, but there are a few hadith (supplemental teachings) which have explicitly prohibited Muslims from creating visual depictions of figures.[citation needed]

    Most Sunni Muslims believe that visual depictions of all the prophets of Islam should be prohibited[3] and are particularly averse to visual representations of Muhammad.[4] The key concern is that the use of images can encourage idolatry.[5] In Shia Islam, however, images of Muhammad are quite common nowadays, even though Shia scholars historically were against such depictions.[4][6] Still, many Muslims who take a stricter view of the supplemental traditions will sometimes challenge any depiction of Muhammad, including those created and published by non-Muslims”

    I liked the sometimes challenge bit.

  6. tom0mason says:

    In keeping with the spirit of ‘freedom of speech’ here is a link to a piece on Mohammed’s image

    http://www.zombietime.com/mohammed_image_archive/

    I post this only for those who will not be offended and enjoy freedom, for all others look away now!

    • Gail Combs says:

      The guy must have been terrified. Glad he managed to survive.

      A link from the same site.

      ‘Anonymous’ Member Calls For Revenge On Terrorists For Charlie Hebdo Massacre

      “Anonymous from around the world have decided to declare war against you, terrorists” a purported member of the hacktivist group said in a video uploaded to YouTube, referring to the killers responsible for the attack on French satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo. Speaking in French on Anonymous’s Belgian channel, the cybervigilante warned terrorists, “We will track all your online activity, we will close your accounts on every social network.”

      A post to text board Pastebin associated with the message states that “We will fight always and everywhere the enemies of freedom of speech…Freedom of speech and opinion is a non-negotiable thing, to tackle it is to attack democracy. Expect a massive frontal reaction from us because the struggle for the defense of those freedoms is the foundation of our movement.”

      The video message to the Charlie Hebdo attackers roughly translates to “We will find you until the very last one, destroy you. You killed innocents. You won’t bring Shariah to our democracies. We won’t let your stupidity destroy our freedom of press.”

    • gofer says:

      “Zineb El Rhazoui, a columnist at Charlie Hebdo magazine who worked on the new issue, told the BBC that the staff didn’t want to express hatred toward the terrorists who killed her colleagues.”

  7. Robertv says:

    Madame Rothschild tells Lasha Darkmoon in a private email that the Charlie Hebdo affair was a Mossad operation.

    http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/entertainment/drama/news.php?q=1421168420

    • Anti-Semitism runs deep in Europe

    • gator69 says:

      Dear Lasha,

      … I am a resident of France and have many friends in high places in Paris and elsewhere: not only do I believe that the Paris circus was not done by the Muslims, I actually know for a certainty that it was not…

      A few young ladies whom I know and who are active in the Palestinian movement—with your own countryman, George Galloway, I believe—explained everything to me two days ago. This whole event was organized in Brussels. Even Ahmed Merabet, the first French policeman purportedly shot dead, is actually not a Muslim at all: his real name is Avigdor, and his brother’s name is Maloch, recently changed to Melek—all of them crypto-Jews in the service of Israeli intelligence, i.e., Mossad agents.

      Avigdor is in Buenos Aires right now, and will remain there for six years, a standard operating procedure with those deep in Israeli psyops. After this he will resurface with a new identity, by which time of course the populace will have forgotten all about the Paris attacks.

      That’s rich! Something else for the Truthers to drool over. 😆

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *