BBC Post-Election Analysis

11 Responses to BBC Post-Election Analysis

1. Steve Case says:

   May 13, 2015 at 11:44 am

   You know what? Reality is almost that bad.

   Reply
2. aaron says:

   May 13, 2015 at 11:49 am

   Communist at the news. At least they did what they where planning to do over a half century ago and take over the media.

   Reply
   • Gail Combs says:

     May 13, 2015 at 12:53 pm

     The Banksters (J.P. Morgan and Assoc.) took over the US media in 1917 just in time to make sure the USA ended up in WWI they have controled the USA via propaganda and the control of our money ever since.

     I looked at the board of Directors and other information for US news media HERE and HERE.

     If you want to know who controls your news look at the board of directors and their history.

     For example here is World Wild Life Fund and Shell connections link

     Reply
3. richard clenney says:

   May 13, 2015 at 12:05 pm

   Remember the horse race between Secretariat and the Russian horse? Russians challenged Sec.
   to a two-horse race in Moscow. Sec’s owners agreed, but Russia had to swear to report the results truthfully.When Sec won the race by 10 lengths, Pravda truthfully reported that a horse
   race had been held, and the Russian horse finished 2nd, the american horse finished next to last.How you say it counts.

   Reply
4. rhymeafterrhyme says:

   May 13, 2015 at 12:08 pm

   “Thank you Nicola Sturgeon
   For putting the Tories in power,
   You terrified the English
   When it came to the hour,
   The balance of power
   You said you would hold,
   The English said “No way!”
   And gave Labour a cold…..”

   Read more: http://wp.me/p3KQlH-Ks

   Reply
5. Frank K. says:

   May 13, 2015 at 1:08 pm

   You could change BBC to CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, HLN etc., and the way politics is reported would be identical…

   Fortunately, the old MSM news machine is disintegrating and is becoming largely irrelevant. This fact is one of the major reasons pollsters got the UK election so wrong. No one cares what a network reporter or anchor thinks or says anymore.

   Reply
   • Ernest Bush says:

     May 13, 2015 at 3:08 pm

     It has been shown that people will deliberately lie to main stream media polls just for the grief it causes them.

     Reply
     • rah says:

       May 13, 2015 at 3:44 pm

       It has also been shown that all the mainstream pundits, there and here, have not a clue WTF they’re talking about. Be sure they will try the exact same lies here if a Republican is ahead in their internals as the presidential election nears.

       That cartoon does not even make sense really.

       Reply
     • Chris Barron says:

       May 13, 2015 at 7:54 pm

       I would say it is almost a duty to lie to the media now….they encroach into every area of what little bit of privacy we have left….so when they ask me for my view on politics, which is my private issue and nobody else’s, well they don’t expect me to willingly give up one of the last private things I have, do they ?

       Reply
6. Paul in Sweden says:

   May 13, 2015 at 4:22 pm

   Back in the USA we have an acronym for certain members on the right:
   – Republicans in Name Only (RINOs).

   In the UK it seems they have on their supposed Right of the political Spectrum the majority of members if not the entirety including Cameron:

   – Conservative Undertaking Not Tried

   I think it is even worse here in Sweden.

   Reply
7. Chris Barron says:

   May 13, 2015 at 7:55 pm

   And I wondered if I was alone in thinking that Milliband was being such a dick just to put people off on purpose

   Reply