The frequency of hot days in the US has plummeted. The frequency of days over 90 degrees and over 100 degrees has plummeted since the 1930’s
Climate alarmists lie about this endlessly, in order to push political agendas.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- spren on “filled with racist remarks”
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Bob G on “falsely labeling”
- Bill on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- William on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Mac on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- arn on Protesting Too Much Snow
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
George Orwell got it right, “Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”
Who controls thinks that climate change is not worth talking about.
The key topics for discussion this year include:
Artificial Intelligence
Cybersecurity
Chemical Weapons Threats
Current Economic Issues
European Strategy
Globalisation
Greece
Iran
Middle East
NATO
Russia
Terrorism
United Kingdom
USA
US Elections
http://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/press-release.html
Sounds like hot days are in de make. Even the Pope has a bad feeling.
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/pope-francis-says-senses-atmosphere-war-world-090033895.html#OaF7gEn
We see a clear increase in ionizing radiation, just as it was in 2006, in 23 solar cycle. Increased ionization is already visible in the form of a large cloud cover over the North Atlantic.
http://cosmicrays.oulu.fi/webform/query.cgi?startday=10&startmonth=01&startyear=2015&starttime=00%3A00&endday=10&endmonth=06&endyear=2015&endtime=00%3A00&resolution=Automatic+choice&picture=on
http://www.sat24.com/en/eu
Secondary particles of GCR also initiate electrical discharges in the atmosphere.
http://sol.spacenvironment.net/raps_ops/current_files/rtimg/dose.15km.png
Click.
Thanks, ren, for the reminder that high levels of “cosmic radiation” accompany low levels of “solar activity.”
If our host, Steven Goddard, is in the UK, I urge him to share his understanding of the current global climate with Roger Helmer, MEP (Member of Parliament for Eastern Midlands):
https://rogerhelmermep.wordpress.com/2015/06/10/european-energy-markets-hit-by-senseless-regulatory-intervention/
Roger Helmer is unusually well-informed about science and technology.
Reblogged this on The Grey Enigma.
Except for Sacramento and Washington DC. Plenty of Hot Gas at those locations.
For urban stations, the older temps should be adjusted upwards – by as much as 5-8 degrees F, to account for the urban heat island effect today.
Request – would it be possible to create the same graphs for the State of California? They could really come in handy in the “heated” debate out here.
California is tricky because they recently added a station in Death Valley that skews the results.
Thanks much.
Nevertheless these graphs are valuable
Also, Stevengoddard, the fact that you note a single station addition shows that you are
being careful in what you present.
Because I am using much of what you present, (and to which I must give you credit) it is imperative that I make no incorrect presentations. One, and only one would cast everything into doubt.
California is one state where this sort of analysis is simply misleading. The widely varying climate there makes station location critical.
Of course.
http://www.john-daly.com/stations/badwater.htm
I guess we all know that even if there are zero days above 60 degree F in the next 20 years
the climate cult will pretend that global warming will kill us all.
2/3 of Americans refuse to pay one hundred dollars per year, to prevent global warming:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/06/06/2third-americans-100-per-year-too-much-prevent-global-warming/
Not even $100??
To stop the “end of the world” as the warmist loons put it?
It’s that big of a problem? Nope. “Not a problem.”
The climate is just the same as it ever was. So what’s the deal with the hyperventilating Chicken Littles that want to dismantle industrial civilization, and particularly the industrial civilization of the west and the US?
“Isn’t the only hope for this planet the total collapse of industrial civilisation? Is it not our responsibility to ensure that this collapse happens?” -Maurice Strong, ex UNEP Director
“A massive campaign must be launched to de-develop the United States.” -John Holdren (1973), Obama’s current Science Czar
Maurice Strong and John Holdren are the enemies of mankind. They should be considered a kind of cancer.
Yes.
Of course you should add Paul Ehrlich to that list, though he has other ideas on what cancer is:
Bishop Hill had the video of another British MP objecting to policies based on seriously flawed models of AGW.
My research mentor, the late Dr. Paul Kazuo Kuroda, probably risked his life by retaining possession of Japan’s atomic bomb design for fifty-seven years,
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/2170881.stm
to prevent growth of this sinister side of post-WWII consensus science:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Introduction.pdf
The Sun’s pulsar core made our elements, birthed the solar system, and sustains every atom, life and planet in the solar system today.
http://www.bishop-hill.net/blog/2015/6/11/david-davies-does-climate-change.html
Another British politician is looking for evidence of AGW science:
1. David Davies: above
2. Roger Helmer: https://rogerhelmermep.wordpress.com/2015/06/11/european-energy-markets-hit-by-senseless-regulatory-intervention-2/
Mr. Omanuel, sir: you are an exceptionally studied and intelligent man. Thank you for most of the things you post here, if only because I’ve learned a lot by reading them. If I may be so bold as to ask one question of you, it would be this: Is Jesus Christ the Son the Creator and Sustainer of Earth and the universe, or is the sun the Creator and Sustainer of the Earth and the Universe?
Thanks, ~Louie
Louie,
My personal religious beliefs are not an appropriate topic for discussion here, but . . .
they are consistent with scientific evidence neutron repulsion in the pulsar core of the Sun is the source of energy that made and sustains every atom, life and world in the solar system.
Reblogged this on Climatism.