Email Subscribe
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Scott Allen on Restoring The Pleasant Climate Of 310 PPM CO2
- Gerald Machnee on What Could Possibly Go Wrong?
- Rory Forbes on The Symptoms Of Global Cooling
- arn on Restoring The Pleasant Climate Of 310 PPM CO2
- daniel belinfante on Restoring The Pleasant Climate Of 310 PPM CO2
Archives
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
New Video : Accelerating Rate Of Sea Level Fraud
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
According to the AAAS, in Science magazine,
125,000 years ago, the temperature was warmer and the seas were 6-9 meters higher.
And this was caused by?
“this was caused by”…a guess.
Gavin Schmidt says Exotic Physics and that we are just a unsure as before but the unsureness is on a much more solid footing:
Take for example the Eocene, some 30 million years ago, the warmest period in recent Earth history where atmospheric concentrations of CO2 rose above 700 ppm and palm trees and crocodile-like animals thrived in near Arctic latitudes. Climate models have a hard time explaining how the Eocene could be so warm at the poles even with CO2 concentrations much higher than today. “We’re either looking at new feedbacks that kick in in the polar regions at high temperatures, possibly associated with vegetation and aerosols or hazes,” Schmidt says. Or “it could be exotic physics that happens.”
In fact, despite decades of better observations and simulations, this range of climate sensitivity hasn’t changed much since 1979 when a National Research Council report on climate change led by meteorologist Jule Gregory Charney assessed climate sensitivity in the range of two to four degrees C of warming from a doubling of atmospheric CO2. “We may be just as unsure as before,” says Gavin Schmidt, a climate modeler and director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies. “But we are unsure on a much more solid footing.”
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-most-important-number-in-climate-change/
I am glad we know all of this! whew!!!
Sunrays are very exotic-
maybe cause they are from outer space?
Susan,
According to the proxies from trapped chemistries from Lake Vostok Antarctica ice cores, that was the peak of the Emian interglacial epoch. It is believed the Emian was warmer then than the current interglacial, the Holocene, which is the coolest of the last 5 interglacials, and which is getting long in the tooth. But, why the Emian was warmer than the Holocene Optimum, I don’t know.
A graph showing the repeated cycles and over the last 420,000 years, and how they compare to today:
http://www.climate4you.com/images/VostokTemp0-420000%20BP.gif
Present day is in the lower left corner of the red rectangle.
Eemian.
I wondered why the Holocene Optimum never had the spike up in temps that the last 4 interglacials had, and why temps were higher when CO2 levels were lower.
I became disillusioned.
The Younger Dryas
https://www.robertschoch.com/plasma_iceage.html
Thanks Robert, but I don’t think so. I am aware of the YD, and yes, the YD was likely impact related. But it came and went long before the Holocene Interglacial Optimum.
To put the Younger Dryas in perspective, in the Vostok proxies of the last four ice ages and five interglacials, the initial warming spike and YD drop can be seen on the left side of the far-right blue ‘mountain’ (it’s the thin sliver of a spike and drop between -2.0 and -4.0):
http://www.climate4you.com/images/VostokTemp0-420000%20BP.gif
I guess it could have been other impact events that cut the legs off of the Minoan, Roman and Medieval warm periods of the current interglacial. But, it wasn’t the YD. The Holocene Optimum was cooler than the optima of the prior four interglacials for another reason – something besides CO2 made those interglacial optima warmer than the current interglacial epoch.
And I accepted Susan’s question as rhetorical, to highlight the lunacy of doomsayers answer to pre-industrial warmth!
N_d, I bet you are right.
And, perhaps there’s one ignorant believer in the doomsayer message perusing here who has never seen what the Vostok cores say. ;-)
Well done. Are you expecting a legal challenge from these fanatics?
Of course not. I would be their worst nightmare on the witness stand.
Too true. Would have been entertaining though, all that delicious “discovery”…Keep up the good work. The “Hockeystick” is putting Mark Steyn through the ringer…or is it the Court?
Hahaha! That would be great! Let’s only hope! Keep it up!
NASA Not Associated with Statistical Accuracy