The New World Order

This is an historic moment.

We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order

we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.’s founders.

GHW Bush  January 17, 1991

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

31 Responses to The New World Order

  1. Scarface says:

    “The rule of law, not the law of the jungle.”

    So, no worries. /s

    • arn says:

      The real “funny” thing is that before the speech Bush bombed iraq,
      and after the speech created on purpose the Highway of Death.
      Killing many soldiers for doing what Bush wanted them to do:
      Leave Kuwait.
      While leaving 98% of the soldiers were killed and the region contaminated with uranium.

      And the bushs continued destroyinh other countries on purpose.

      Their rule of law is the rule of the dschungle and always was.

  2. Billyjack says:

    The Bush Crime syndicate exceeds the Clinton Crime Syndicate in longevity.

  3. feathers says:

    No thanks.

    I see two versions of globalism. The first is the one laid out by Bush 41 and accelerated under Obama. In this “New World Order”, The United States is part of a Globalized economy and since the US makes up about 4.3% of the world’s population, we really shouldn’t expect much more than that portion (4.3% slice) of the global economy. To expect a “larger slice” is racist.

    The second version of globalism is one that is embraced by Trump, where every nation has access to the global market. However, we all compete (fairly) for our share of the global economy. And of course when the US makes moves to create the world’s best business environment (lower corp. tax to 21%, access to the world’s most productive workforce and highly skilled labor, etc.) the New World Order freaks out (including all Democrats).

    This is what MAGA means to me!

    • Al Shelton says:

      Well said… That will put a feather in your cap.

    • Johansen says:

      I don’t know, Feathers….
      The World is governed by force. The only “World-Orders” we have had were inaugurated and maintained by brute force – the empires of ancient Mesopotamia, the Persians under Cyrus, the Assyrians a couple times, the Babylonian a couple times, the Roman empire, the Holy Roman empire, the British empire, the ‘American’ empire, and so forth.

      I don’t think “equal/fair access to a global market” brings the Messianic/Millennial age – I’m speaking poetically. What Trump is doing is making America great again, by stopping the insufferable globalist agenda (as you eloquently point out in paragraph 2). I don’t see this as a “New World Order – version 2.0”, if by that you mean, “peace is suddenly going to reign supreme everywhere”. I see it as a U.S. President (finally) representing Americans, and defending the **U.S. Constitution**, and ripping the mask off a whole lot of very evil actors in our gubment

    • Johansen says:

      IDK, maybe that’s what you’re saying

  4. Disillusioned says:

    That man, former head of the the sea-ah-ay, was creepy. As is John Vladimir Brennan.

    • Johansen says:

      Now they’re reporting Comey used to be a Communist. Sheesh… that means the Directors of the FBI and CIA during the Obama years were former Communists. It’s frightening, but maybe not surprising

  5. TimA says:

    Eeeek!! What a creep!!

  6. PhD Guy says:

    I remember very distinctly how this speech raised eyebrows in 1991. Today the push for a New World Order is not hidden but thrown in your face especially in Europe. The Global Elitists ultimately want you to give up your sovereignty to the UN or a regional government like that of the EU.

    • arn says:

      The coming EU of america
      is the nafta zone.
      And they are pushing this “unification” with interressting global propaganda methods as the soccer world championship which is hosted
      in 2026 by mexico,usa and canada-
      one of those amazing coincidences.

  7. GW Smith says:

    The new world order, like all kinds of socialism, presumes all humans are fair minded and rational, which is not true, nor has it ever been true. In fact, the opposite is true, that humans are self interested, selfish, lustful for power, and inclined to see others as less than human. In this case, the truer case, fascism and authoritarianism always takes over. But no one wants to admit it.

    • Johansen says:

      Agreed. It appeals to lazy a– people that want their sh– for free, while being some of most judgmental, Pharisaical people on the planet. There, I just judged them all in one sentence:)

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      All known varieties of socialism are built on the concept of evil and guilty classes that are responsible for the misfortune of others, whether it’s the bourgeoisie, Jews, imperialists, white devils or the deplorables.

      The socialists believe that taking away the rights of the respective classes, eliminating them and confiscating their property will create or restore peace and social justice for the the rest of society.

      Economic upheaval, suffering and killing follow as the socialists move to take power. The results are well documented in history.

      In best case outcomes the despised “evil and guilty” classes can defend themselves and defeat the socialists but rather than peace a temporary truce is established in the destroyed and exhausted societies until the socialists reorganize to advance again.

  8. JCalvertN(UK) says:

    Eisenhower said, “During the long lane of the history yet to be written, America knows that this world of ours, ever growing smaller, must avoid becoming a community of dreadful fear and hate, and be, instead, a proud confederation of mutual trust and respect. Such a confederation must be one of equals. The weakest must come to the conference table with the same confidence as do we, protected as we are by our moral, economic, and military strength . . .”

  9. just a thought says:

    ”…a credible United Nations…” – GHW Bush

    Anyone who thinks the UN “peacekeepers,” who are notorious for exploiting the locals under their “protection,” are “credible;” at best hasn’t got a moral compass. At worst, he’s no better.

  10. Robertv says:

    They must have unlimited resources . So who exactly is financing this? Who can print all the money they need?

  11. rah says:

    The new world order is Alyssa Milano calling Jon Voight “a has been”.
    That is an actress with no nominations for an Oscar or a Golden Globe calling an actor with than Oscar and 4 nominations and 4 Golden Globes with 11 nominations “a has been”. Now THAT is a new world order.

  12. Walter says:

    Lol to the “rare” tag put up on the YouTube video.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.