Science Vs. The Extinction Rebellion

The expansion of life on earth peaked when CO2 was at its maximum 540 million years ago.

When life exploded | Science News for Students

https://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/PageMill_Images/image277.gif

Meanwhile 15th century thugs being financed by people like George Soros and Tom Steyer, continue their war against science and civilization.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

27 Responses to Science Vs. The Extinction Rebellion

  1. Dave T says:

    I watch everything you post on You Tube, and share a great deal of it. Thank you for what you are doing.

    Question- why are you still buying into the “settled science” and alleged consensus of evolutionary “science”, including millions and billions of years? There are others out there with serious science credentials that have shown this all to be a bad interpretation of the facts and observable data. Ironically, and not surprisingly, climate alarmist “scientists” use much the same tactics and techniques that evolutionists have used for centuries (Darwinian evolutionary theory was not the beginning, as it were).

    • tonyheller says:

      I’m a geologist. I can see the evolution of life in the fossil record.

    • Archie says:

      I’d like to see those “serious science credentials.” Evolutionary theory and the fossil record are not untested and if you are hinting at Noah’s Flood, why no bunnies with the dinosaurs?

      And Darwin never tried to scare me and upend my life. Climate Change (the trademarked CC, not real CC) proponents actually use the tools of organized religion — mostly fear, and not science.

      • David T says:

        That’s cute, but there is a lot more in the fossil record that is missing than “bunnies alongside dinosaurs”.

        Let’s just skip straight to the chase. Without a mechanism to come up with the basic building blocks of life, you have nothing there that can evolve from bunnies to dinosaurs. The science of organic chemistry removes any doubt that this could happen by chance and time, both of which are not the allies of life coming from goo.

        This guy is first going to point out how he is an active, current scientist who has quite a few patents. Then he is going to show you the science.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zU7Lww-sBPg&t=46s

        • Archie says:

          David, I don’t have the hour to watch this but it doesn’t matter. “Creation” could easily be accounted for within the current scientific framework. I haven’t found a biologist/zoologist who can explain the difference between a living cell and a dead cell. Life is a mystery (the soul) but the process of life, less so (the body). I’ll give you GOD but god works through physical laws in this dimension. What god does in other dimensions is a mystery since we don’t live there. A good illustration is the question of which came first, the seed or the tree. The answer is, God is not a fool to carry trees around when he can carry a seed.

          • David T says:

            Archie,

            Asks for serious science, doesn’t have a whole 58 minutes for it lol.

            Either way, thank you for the reply. Not only can creation be “accounted for within the current scientific framework”, given the advances we have made over the last 100 years there is nothing else that lines up with what we see. (cf. Acts 17:30-31)

            God does not “work through physical laws in this dimension” so much as He created those very laws of nature. And while God has not revealed everything about Himself (cf. Deuteronomy 29:29), there is no reason to anticipate other dimensions exist, at least not as scientists often imagine them in order to compensate for the serious flaws in their theories.

            As for which came first, the seed or the tree, the chicken or the egg, that much He has told us- plants yielding seeds came first; chickens bearing eggs came first. (cf. Genesis 1:11-12; 20-21)

            God never asked us to check our brains at the door in order to believe in Him- quite the opposite, and where the Bible touches on the material (science), it is always right, and right in ways that were beyond the reach and view of mankind when each book was written. (the earth is circular when viewed from above; there are great channels at the bottom of the oceans, etc.)

          • Archie says:

            David, that’s the problem in a nutshell, the twisting and contorting to get things to fit the Bible. When I say God, you hear God of the Bible. The Bible may have been, in part, revealed knowledge but consider the audience (2000+ year old culture). Look for the current revealed knowledge and you’ll do better.

            Maybe instead of “dimensions” I should have said, “Higher Vibrational States.”

    • KevinPaul says:

      I’ve yet to see any fossils that conclusively convince me of one species becoming another, adaption yes, evolution no. Adaptions I believe are sub-routines in the genome that are called by environmental apigenetics to either compile or not, and they were encoded at the creation of that species.

      The Hebrew word for day as used in Genesis does not equate to a literal 24 hour earth day, nor necessarily a 1000 earth years, it just delineates one creative period from another.

      I hunt for gold nuggets and have seen things that convince me that the earth is either very old, or it was created with continental dislocation, vast sedimentary strata, and mountains reduced to clay etc., in situ.

      We have paleosols nearby around 44 degrees south, they are associated with megafauna and megaflora fossils and a very warm humid climate. The country was covered in very dense lush greenery and the CO2 was much greater than it is now and excepting the big teeth must have been edenic.

      • Disillusioned says:

        Kevin,

        “Adaption” is not a word with which I am familiar. You used it twice in the above post. Perhaps you meant to say ‘adaptAtion.’

        Please forgive the picayune comment, but that one was like fingernails on a chalk board. Please know that I enjoy your posts, and I agree with your posts almost all of the time.

        Cheers

  2. Gator says:

    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.
    -Charles Mackay

    This is why democracies are dangerous, and why our founders created a representative republic instead.

  3. Stewart Pid says:

    Tony likely laughed at this years ago and my above post reminded me of the fight between paleotologists: Some critics jokingly referred to the theory of punctuated equilibrium as “evolution by jerks”, which prompted Gould to describe phyletic gradualism as “evolution by creeps.”

  4. rah says:

    Tony this is completely off topic but I thought you and some others here my be interested. As you know the so called “Intelligence Community” is running a redux of Russia, Russia, Russia but this time it’s Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine. The whole thing started from a supposed IG complaint based completely on hearsay. Enter Stephen McIntyre, yes the one we know, the 97% and hockey stick debunker, etc., etc. Stephen was poking around and figured out that the ICIG changed the standards for filing an “whistle blower” complaint from a requirement to have first hand knowledge to allowing hearsay. https://twitter.com/ClimateAudit/status/1177580473566093312

    Others who have been blogging on the deep state attempt to take Trump out then picked up on it. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/27/breaking-icig-whistleblower-form-recently-modified-to-permit-complaint-heard-from-others/

    • Stewart Pid says:

      Good find Rah …. thanks for sharing …. Stephen McIntyre is one bright guy.

      • rah says:

        And tenacious as hell and thus dangerous to anyone that is lying that comes to his attention.
        Who would have thought that the word “intelligence” used today in it’s form having to do with the collection of information for any purpose other than military operations or those involved in such activities would become a trigger word in the United States having a viscerally negative connotation to a huge number of American citizens. Anyone aware knows who we have to thank for the political weaponization of the “Intelligence Community”.

        • Spuyten Duyvil says:

          Sundance at CTH and Tony must have similar genes. How is there enough time in the day for them to conduct the research, separate the chaff, prepare an article and then post for the world to read? And do it multiple times a day! These guys must never sleep. But I want them to know their efforts are appreciated very much.

  5. Kenan Meyer says:

    Is it true that there is no geologist on the IPCCC panel? I haven’t been able to find a link with credible information

  6. Tyrannosaurus Rex says:

    The Climate Crisis truly is young earth creationism. Dinosaurs probably weren’t the brightest beasts, but I bet they were better climatologists than our officials.

  7. Doreen says:

    500 Scientists Signed Letter to UN Stating, “There Is No Climate Emergency” https://clintel.nl/brief-clintel-aan-vn-baas-guterres/

  8. Dear Tony Heller,

    You were highly recommended to me by my close friend Dr. Carl Laney, retired Professor at Western Seminary in Portland, Oregon, by Answers in Genesis, and by Climate Scientist ROBERT W. ENDLICH, MSci (Meteorology)

    Earth Scientist, Climate Alarm Skeptic
    21 years Weather Officer, USAF
    28 years Meteorologist White Sands Missile Range & NMSU Physical Science Laboratory
    Climate Study Web Site: https://casf.me/

    I must profoundly thank you and give you my highest commendation for your nuclear exploding of the Climate Change myth.

    I wrote an expose on it opposing Katharine Hayhoe an increasingly famous Climate Change Evangelist. So I wanted to send you part of that letter and report below for your highly esteemed consideration, which includes my recent letter to Greta Thunberg.

    Thank you again!

    Kindest regards,

    James Sundquist
    Eaglemasterworksproductions.com
    *****
    Dear Greta Thunberg,

    I heard your speech to the UN today.

    As a God-fearing Christian, I know that we are commanded to be good stewards of God’s Creation. In fact, so critical is this command that God vomited the Israelites out of the land he gave them for polluting the land. And there is no doubt pollution going on today. But what about the environment of infants in the womb of their mother who get aborted? They are surrounded with chemicals and burned to death and torn limb from limb without ever even getting a chance to drink in even one breath of oxygen, or even C02. Isn’t it exponentially hypocritical for many of the world’s “leaders” as you call them to promote the murdering of babies in their mother’s womb’s with exponentially more Nazi like ovens of the mother’s womb than most of mankind is enduring in any man-made climate change outside of the womb. And every single one of these abortions is made-made climate change for the environment of every fetus aborted. So to use your words, “how dare you”, that is what should be said and directed to every woman who aborts a child and destroys their environment for good, resulting in millions upon millions of genocide deaths! And these infants won’t even get 11 years if that is how long the earth will survive, the don’t even get 9 month, in most cases. For all of those people concerned about the children crossing the border into the United States, why don’t they open up the borders of the wound to let them enter unto life and least get a taste of oxygen?

    Regarding the question if Climate Change is Man-Made or God-Made, I submit the following question: “How dare you not repent of your sins?”

    If someone were to ask me: “Do you believe in Global Warming, or Climate Change?” I would say YES! But not for the reasons they would think. I don’t believe in man-made global warming, but I do believe in God-made global warming as Scripture promises and prophesied. It is called first the Global Flood of water (and never again) as a judgment on the earth, but the next time with fire:
    No, there is no such thing as man-made global warming climate change myth, science falsely so-called, as the Apostle Paul would say, rather GOD-made Global Warming as part of the End Times Judgment on the earth of the wicked!
    “The first angel sounded his trumpet, and there came hail and fire mixed with blood, and it was hurled down on the earth. A third of the earth was burned up, a third of the trees were burned up, and all the green grass was burned up.” Revelation 8:7

    And as you know the Apostle Peter told us that God’s first global judgment was by water with Noah’s Flood, but final judgment will be by fire where the elements will melt with a fervent heat. I would call that Global Warming, wouldn’t you? But GOD-MADE, not MAN-MADE. But the interesting thing is that even after all of that, God still preserves the earth and mankind (unlike the threats of the Green Party false prophecy). And there will still be seasons.

    This is the global warming warning we should teach our children so that they will fear the Lord!

    BLESSINGS
    James Sundquist
    Eaglemasterworksproductions.com

    And in your own State of Texas, Dr. Robert Jeffress, Pastor of First Baptist Church in Dallas, Texas, stated this commentary about Greta Thunberg:

    Jeffress, a spiritual adviser to President Trump and frequent defender of the administration’s policies, downplayedThunberg’s concerns Sept. 23 on Todd Starnes’ radio show by referencing the biblical story of Noah’s Ark.

    “Somebody needs to read poor Greta Genesis Chapter 9 and tell her next time she worries about global warming just look at a rainbow,” Jeffress said. “That’s God’s promise that the polar ice caps aren’t going to melt and flood the world again.”

    The three-chapter-long Genesis flood narrative — where God spares Noah, his family and livestock from a worldwide flood that kills all land-dwelling creatures — ends with God setting his bow in the clouds to signify a covenant promising “the waters shall never again become a flood to destroy all flesh.”

    Source: pro-trump-pastor-robert-jeffress-uses-bible-to-debunk-science-of-climate-change

    But this commentary could just as easily have been written about Andrew Farley and Katharine Hayhoe!

    CLIMATE CHANGE

    You said that you investigated opposing views of Climate Change. Did you know about these reports on Katharine Hayhoe when you were interviewed on CBN?:

    ROBERT W. ENDLICH:

    https://casf.me/
    (Search on site for “Madame Hayhoe”)

    https://casf.me/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/An-Analysis-of-Katharine-Hayhoe-s_Video-and-Climate-Lecture_16_Feb_2019-2.pdf

    DAVID LEGATES:
    https://cornwallalliance.org/2017/11/climate-change-and-the-christian-faith/

    JOE BASTARDI OF WEATHERBELL.COM:
    https://notrickszone.com/2018/07/30/meteorologist-joe-bastardi-shows-how-texas-climatologists-permadrought-predictions-flopped/

    and finally, ANSWERS IN GENESIS:

    ELIZABETH MITCHELL, M.D.:
    https://answersingenesis.org/environmental-science/climate-change/evangelical-climatologist-spreads-message-climate-change-stewardshi

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.