Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming! Please help with a gift by clicking the button below.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Arctic Sea Ice To Disappear Again
- Disillusioned on Arctic Sea Ice To Disappear Again
- GWS on Arctic Sea Ice To Disappear Again
- toorightmate on Dark Days In New England
- GWS on Dark Days In New England
Archives
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
Well done again Tony!
Another excellent video which by looking at the history, demonstrates that current data is manipulated for effect, and so called scientific research is out and out lies and sophistry. Lies that are used by the sick but powerful morons who wish to control this and the next generation.
Keep-up the good work, the current and next generation need to know the truth!
Temps and AMO a superb match, all the more so given the timescale and cyclical nature of the evidence.
Beyond ANY doubt AMO causes Arctic temperatures.
The odds against those two datasets correlating so closely over multiple decades and temperature swings yet just being a ‘coincidence’ are so off the scale as to be impossible. Yet even when faced with utterly compelling, measured observations the ‘climate science’ industry still lies through its teeth and politicians look the other way. Staggering.
The money graph to end all money graphs is the one showing the correlation of Icelandic temperature with the AMO.
Brilliant stuff Tony, you deserve a Congressional Medal of Honour but I guess the Democrat majority wouldn’t have the intelligence to understand your work.
Tony:
Fantastic job at showing the depravity of the so called science around the many examples of agenda driven propaganda. I really admire your dogged efforts at digging up and correlating all these historical and succinct demonstrations of the fallacy of the whole alarmist cult.
I’m no climate guru, but have always been skeptical about anything I’ve been told. I like to dig and research the facts behind things – and concluded in my own efforts back when the ozone myth was perpetrated – that it was a farce.
Now I’ve gotten fed up with all the caterwauling about CO2, and decided to do my own experimentation. It is something anyone can do with low cost and some diligence and a bit of easy math. (there’s reliable online calculators for the complex stuff)
My results show CO2 cannot possibly be the bogey man it is made out to be. And indeed it is true that the foundational basis for all this climate crap is to have violated the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
That is to say, heat can only flow from hot to cold. Including radiative emissions! The Stefan-Boltzman (S-B) relation in it’s proper form conforms to this, however most of the gibberish even in peer reviewed junk – the notion of “downwelling” radiation is used as if gospel.
Nothing is further from the truth, or reality. The colder atmosphere, CO2 or water vapor, cannot radiate down to warmer ground! The warmer ground radiates upward, and the greenhouse gases modulate this upward radiative cooling. That is they reduce the rate of ground cooling via radiation.
Math is not reality! Math can be a symbolic means to represent reality. But if used incorrectly math can be un-physical, or not empirically consistent with reality.
You can calculate the “radiative” emission of an atmospheric component in isolation and call it downwelling – but that is not necessarily reality. You must include the radiator temperature^4 minus the surrounding temperature^4 in the S-B relation.
When you do so, the sign of the result shows the relative direction of the radiative emission. It is always from the ground toward space – period! (except in rare cases of a low altitude temperature inversion such as when ground is cold and a warm front proceeds – but these conditions are short lived and a small percentage of the time/area regards the globe)
So the fundamental tenets of GHG theory is not based on accepted laws of physics. Downwelling radiation is a myth as it is used commonly in this whole fiasco. If you believe downwelling radiation can heat the ground – then you also believe in perpetual motion machines for both violate the 2nd Law!
My point was not to sermonize – but to share results of my experiment. I will do it in 3 posts as this comment mechanism seems to only allow one image upload per post.
But to summarize the results so far in 1 month of observations: obtaining the temperature, relative humidity and measuring ground and vertical sky temperature with an IR thermometer – and you can calculate the absolute humidity rendered in ppmv of water vapor (from air, R.H and barometric pressure).
https://www.aqua-calc.com/calculate/humidity
Plotting the sky temperature against water vapor ppmv I found absolute humidity varied from ~5,000 ppmv to ~25,000 ppmv, and sky temperature then varies from -80F to +25F respectively.
I cross checked the veracity of my IR instrument by measuring cloud base temperature, when observed conditions had SCT or BKN conditions. (using aviation nomenclature as the best data is from airport/aviation info) Aviation data shows the altitude of those cloud bases.
This cross check had cloud bases from ~1,000 to ~6,000 feet ASL. My location is 15 feet ASL. The cross check is to see if the normal lapse rate occurs. It does. So my instrument is indeed accurate to at least 6,000 feet altitude.
Last I took the ground temperature as (T^4) and vertical clear sky temperature as (Tc^4) in the S-B relation. P=e0A(T^4 – Tc^4) and plotted radiative emission of the ground towards vertical clear sky vs water vapor ppmv.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/stefan.html#c2
The result is at 5,000 ppmv water vapor the ground emission is 245 w/m², and at 25,000 ppmv water vapor the ground emission is 140 w/m².
For comparison the IPCC in 2013 report says CO2 emission is 1.8 w/m². The median radiative emission of the ground with water vapor at say 12,000 ppmv is 100x higher than is the 400 ppmv CO2 emission value. (as a moderator of ground emission, water vapor is 100x more powerful than CO2)
Case closed on this global warming from trace gases – be they CO2 or CFC’s. I expect the caterwaulers will either ignore or attack this…
Water vapor is the main modulator of upwelling radiative cooling of the ground!
3 charts, in this and following 2 posts
chart 2 in the series from previous post
chart 3 in series from previous post
At Davos Greta said “people must start listening to the science”. Did you mean the “Greenhouse Effect”, the “science” behind “Global Warming”, which says atmospheric CO2 warmed by the Earth surface radiates heat back to the Earth surface, and this makes the surface even warmer? Real science says the only way CO2 in the atmosphere could increase Earth surface temperatures by radiation is if the radiating CO2 is HOTTER than the surface. But it is the Sun warmed Earth surface which warms up the COLDER atmospheric CO2 in the first place, and therefore that CO2 can’t become HOTTER than the Sun warmed surface. COOLER atmospheric CO2 CAN’T increase warmer Earth surface temperatures and cause “Global Warming”. The “Greenhouse Effect” describes thermodynamic nonsense (a thermal Perpetual Motion scam!) with heat flowing from COLDER to HOTTER. Any detected “Global Warming” is not caused by atmospheric CO2. How could such a simple fact escape the attention of so many people and allow the CO2 hysteria to damage our way of life? (Former thermodynamics researcher who has identified a further 17 Climate Science thermodynamis errors!).
Some therapists have proposed that the fearful and depressed young people enrolled in the University of Derby’s climate change anxiety classes would benefit from repeatedly listening to this single video even if they didn’t listen to anything else.
Alas, these emotionally frail students will likely suffer a much deeper depression and anxiety when they start discovering the extent of the climate change fraud. Serious mental health problems cannot be treated by a shocking encounter with reality.
With all respect to Dr Bird of the University of Derby, Colorado-based Dr Wellington believes even dance and drama may be too radical for some patients and he still favors traditional safe spaces with padded walls, gentle music, cuddly toys and a lot of crayons as the best introductory remedy. For stabilized patients, videos are included like this one of a puppy tearing up a Donald Trump toy. The medical profession cannot successfully treat climate grief without also addressing climate anger. Self-expression by dance and drama can be prescribed only to climate grief sufferers who responded well to earlier interventions. They already have enough drama in their lives.
—————