2020 State Of The Climate Report

The world faces some important deadlines.  If we don’t stop global warming by the year 2000, entire nations will be wiped off the face of the earth.

U.N. Predicts Disaster if Global Warming Not Checked

The Maldives will drown no later than 2018.

26 Sep 1988 – Threat to islands

The Arctic will be ice-free by 2018.

The Argus-Press – Google News Archive Search

Lower Manhattan will also be underwater by 2018.

Stormy weather – Global warming – Salon.com

The Arctic will also be ice-free by 2014.

Gore: Polar ice cap may disappear by summer 2014

If we don’t stop global warming by the year 2020, entire nations will be wiped off the face of the Earth.

2020 is the deadline to avert climate catastrophe | Daily Mail Online

Britain will have Siberian climate by the year 2020.


Pentagon tells Bush: climate change will destroy us | Environment | The Guardian

Britain has been in permanent drought for eight years.

Drought may be new norm for UK, says environment secretary | Environment | The Guardian

Australia has been in permanent drought for twelve years.

This drought may never break

And snowfalls ended twenty years ago.

Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past – Environment – The Independent

Despite the fact that the world ended twenty years ago, government agencies are still cranking out climate data. Arctic sea ice extent is normal, and the highest in many years.

Charctic Interactive Sea Ice Graph | Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis

Ocean and Ice Services | Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut

Arctic winter temperatures have dropped about 5C since 2016. Summer temperatures have been running consistently below normal.

Ocean and Ice Services | Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut


We are getting record snowfall, year after year.

This is what Taos, New Mexico looked like yesterday.

Snow extent during the snow season has been increasing to record levels for the past 50 years.

NH Fall


NH Winter

For the entire year, snow cover has been above normal for the past five years.

Snow Anomalies

Rainfall in Australia has been increasing for over a centiry.

Australian climate variability & change – Time series graphs

Australian climate variability & change – Time series graphs

Rainfall in the US has been increasing for over 100 years.

Climate at a Glance | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)

Afternoon temperatures have been declining in the US for a century.

The frequency of both hot days and cold nights have been declining for a century.

The daily temperature range in the US has been rapidly declining, as the US climate becomes milder.

Forest fire burn acreage has been plummeting for 90 years.

Indicator 3.16: Area and percent of forest affected by abiotic agents

This closely matches the decline in heatwaves.

Temperature Changes in the United States – Climate Science Special Report

In 2011, Texas academics predicted that Texas would be hot and dry for the rest of the century.

Texas is vulnerable to warming climate – Houston Chronicle

Texas is getting wetter and cooler.

Climate at a Glance | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)

The Maldives are still there.

A few years ago, the Washington Post was terrified by the record low number of hurricanes.

The U.S. coast is in an unprecedented hurricane drought — why this is terrifying – The Washington Post

And 2018 was the first year with no violent tornadoes in the US.

2018 will be the first year with no violent tornadoes in the United States – The Washington Post

Another climate deadline is tomorrow. Congressional Democrats have given YouTube until tomorrow to come with a plan to censor anyone who tells the truth about climate.

Congress urges Google to act against climate misinformation on YouTube

Nancy wants to tear up my State of The Climate Address.

Pelosi Suffers Multiple Strains, Fractures While Ripping Up Trump’s Speech | The Babylon Bee

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to 2020 State Of The Climate Report

  1. Dave N says:

    If Congress were concerned about “misinformation” then they’d be removing swathes of exaggerated crap from alarmists. Anyone see that happening?

    • Allan Kiik says:

      Just an idea – with well researched rebuttals from “realists” it might be possible to help youtube in identifying “exaggerated crap” as real misinformation, and at least tag it as something like that.
      I don’t think it is completely impossible, there is some chance that this is actually an opportunity, if handled well and with as much publicity as possible!

    • Gator says:

      Yep, and this is why I hammer that little nitpicker Phail. He claims to want accuracy and truth, yet he never criticizes alarmists.

      Leftists are pure hypocrites.

    • Sharpshooter says:

      Crickets chirping…in the distance, a coyote howls to its mate.

  2. D. Boss says:

    What an excellent and comprehensive presentation Tony!

    Assume Trump wins in November… Assume GOP retakes the House and maintains the Senate…

    Then take on the fraudsters in Gov perpetrating false data and so called science with actual criminal prosecution for fraud… Make examples of the worst offenders – make every so called scientist, and institution think twice about doing false “pal review” or publishing false information…

    Then charge Google et al with fraud, conspiracy and racketeering, anti trust violations etc – shut Google down with a massive FBI raid, halt trading of their stock, and seize their assets/bank accounts.

    Actually you don’t even have to do the above to Google, just a leaked threat to do so will tank the stock and all those woke assholes will loose their shirts – and threaten to follow through unless they restore or prove an unbiased algorithm in search etc….

    Or shut them down for a day or a week to prove the seriousness – the propaganda leviathan has to be checked somehow before it consumes civilization.

    Well, OK it was just a dream – a President can’t do all that on his own – he’d need backing of Congress and too many of them are in the pockets of the Leviathan, or are too timid to do anything about it…

    But the fake news about Nancy the Ripper – gave me a laugh… Wouldn’t that be the ultimate in “instant Karma”?

  3. Jim Hunt says:

    At the risk of repeating myself:

    Au contraire Tony!


    “Measured” Arctic sea ice volume suggests that the “scam” is all yours?

    • D. Boss says:

      Mr Hunt:

      Tony certainly needs no one to defend his work. However your glib accusation warrants a look.

      Hmm, any objective person can clearly see that one of two scenarios exists with your assertion about a “scam” regards Arctic Sea Ice:

      A) you are ignorant of the difference between area and volume – in which case your misguided assertion can be disregarded.

      B) you are aware of the difference between area and volume, and knowingly compare one data set on ice area (Tony’s) with an alternative data set of ice volume (Hunt’s). Thus comparing two disparate and incompatible sets of data, claiming one data set is a “scam”.

      The only scam when someone knowingly compares apples to oranges and claims one is a false fruit – is a scam by the person doing the comparison sir!

      So you are either ignorant of basic geometric concepts, or are effectively claiming the opposite of truth.

      Furthermore, Tony presents Arctic Sea Ice area data in direct refutation of the claims of Climate Catastrophists that Arctic Sea Ice would have disappeared by now. He quotes these claims directly with actual evidence, and presents actual data from reputable sources on sea ice area(extent) to refute those claims.

      Your own web page has contradictory data represented by charts:
      Your chart above and at the bottom of your webpage shows current ice volume at 14,000 km³; while this chart from midway on your page shows current ice volume at 18,000 km³.

      If these two ice volume data sets are “measured” then their accuracy is most suspect. By the following chart from your website, a 39 year mean shows about 24,000 km³ for this time. So your so called measured data appears to have a +/- 16% error, and the following chart is then only 25% lower than the 39 year mean before the error margin is applied.

      You are not very good at making your case, and I doubt your position would survive a real debate with Tony and his comprehensive historical records.

      I would even say your feeble attempt to refute Tony’s presentation in fact supports his premise! Tony shows the Climate Doom Cult has predicted an ice free arctic by now, and he shows by area this is false, and you show by volume it is also false. So where is the scam?

    • Vegieman says:

      At the risk of repeating myself:

      Jim, you are a joy. There are a few of you that show up here now and then. Scorners really shine in the presence of truth. Your knowledge of ice is definitely unsurpassed. Sorry for the misery it has caused you.
      Is it always cloudy and dreary there on the shores of GB? Other than the shadow being cast by the climate cult, the beauty of creation endures. Tony throws in a video now and then as a reality check – kind of like a webcam. I see you have a link for several sites that view the bleak tundra. I’m sure these can be nice to look at, but try to not let them ruin your day (or ours). Here’s a link to some therapy:
      From the comments these videos generate, they can be quite helpful. Give it a try.
      Otherwise I must say your sardonic behavior is quite disruptive. Maybe take a break from here for awhile and come back after you get a little better attitude. Thanks.

  4. Bjørn Rudholm says:

    The Science respond to the blindfolded heatwave lovers of the globe is almost impossible, when the “debate” in the media levels the kindergarten. This is indeed shown in the invitation of Senator Malcolm Roberts(Queensland, Australia) to the studio in Sky News Australia: https://youtu.be/VmZsSV_k8vs
    Clearly he wasn’t invited for his Sciencebased climate knowledge. I feel it’s the same about realclimatescience.com by Tony Heller, Tim Ball etc. According to the media, they are to be silenced, because of trying to reveal the climate scams…. But, as said in “Dinner For One”: “Same Precedure As Every Year, James” https://youtu.be/UKewQx8On68
    – The weather still doesn’t care about these climate agent liars(NASA, many politicians and other “deranged” climatealarmists), it continously behaves like a child and has it’s own agenda… And that’s the fun and entertaining side about the climate on our earth: rain, drought, snow, winter, spring, summer, hot, cold…. Yes, all the normal weatherchanges as the open mind discovers every day and every year. We are very fortunate to live in these climate maniac times, because at the same time we are blessed with the people of Real Science Teachers in Tony Heller(US), Tim Ball(Canada), Sea Level Specialist Niels Axel Mörner(Sweden)… Some of the few climate truth specialists still going strong, helping us to understand what’s at risk. So from tiny Denmark to Mr. Heller – Keep up revealing the stupidity and insanity climate grounded scam by your insight investigations, good spirit and great sarcasm! Freedom of speech and expression is not to be silenced!

  5. Mr Sir says:

    Did you know: During the month of January 2020 in Helsinki, Finland, there was only 1 day where the low was lower than the average HIGH?


  6. anothermaninthemirror says:

    Tony, wonderful collage of the science debunking of catastrophic alarmist climate change narrative, with a good dollop of humour ! Thank you once again as climate change realists are getting some traction in getting the message out there that this Cult is nothing but that. There are still battles to be fought, lost and won but the final exposing of this humongous fraud and those responsible for this propaganda will occur, if only from the passage of time that will shows that all the dire warnings of catastrophic alarmist climate change cult (CACCC) as in the past, are again false. Keep up your great work.

  7. Mike Morgan says:

    Excellent! Thank you for making the argument against climate hype so clearly.

  8. OldFogey says:

    What I would like to see is POTUS say : “Enough is enough. The UN has scared the world into spending billions and billions of its money over the last thirty years, and has taken no efforts to review the accuracy of its predictions and explain why they were wrong, and explain why their latest predictions should be any more credible. The UN has long passed the point in which it has any constructive role to play in the world, and the US will withdraw from that organization if I am re-elected in November”

    That threat might (just might) be worrying enough for the UN bosses to take a broom to the alarmists in their ranks. If they don’t, then the US and the world would be better off without them.

  9. Scissor says:

    Arctic ice extent today matched the maximum from 1974.

  10. Andy says:

    I think this is vert interesting


    I don’t take that in itself as interesting, it’s the BBC after all.

    But that is at the very tip of the Antarctic. Where you would finally expect warming patterns to take hold after getting through the Southern Ocean blanket.

    Worth watching. Could be a weather glitch. We will see if have some patience.

    • Gator says:

      Judging from the fact that these BBC twits cannot even wipe their own noses, I don’t put much stock in their clearly alarmist writings. The sky is not falling.

  11. Laordn says:

    Reasons why should you Not hook up in addition to your Ex

    it really is quite simple to add a poor propensity which includes tipping for the same particular person for the second work-time, while well as buying a alluring see sitting of them quickly after currently being realized in a moment about weakness even if you’ve already stood a to fall out. it is easy, delighted, and moreover typical. And there are times when you need to provide evidence of that you can do it again, and also that you’ve kept run over them.

    in my opinion, i feel it’s not recommended to chill making use of your ex normally. here are the reasons why leaving out or winning your ex back with an lover are broken out:

    understand it’s the addition of the end if you think it is not what they are utilised to be. you try to my workplace actions gone as partners, however ignite is finished and the relationship produces get an elegance. i have been in affairs specifically I show very for it the marriage gifts fall asleep at night, following rise the very next day curious about that i did not imagine it today.

    individual broke up for an explanation

    in the present a answer why few opportunities up, even when it’s “mutual, or no matter which this reason is or variables tend to this suggests you are not find each other attractive. may perhaps both underwent alterations post split, but there’s not much of a potential for you transforming and be it was similar value after.

    it’s hard for doing it to seem “outstanding”

    the enjoyment portion a romantic relationship is the first stages, And the most efficient ones sustain a component of this by way of your dog’s entire time. unfortunately, not unusual to see challenging to find these feelings after again if you try to hook up and get your ex-lover back with one you really left each other with.

    will probably be offering In

    that habitual into claim one person up after a breakup. You assured that you might never get back together with them, along with that you have mastered what not to look for in a male. however often there is disadvantages caught up when fixing the relationship with a partner, you atmosphere you’ll gifting in chnlove just a, Which has never been a superior demeanor during romance a different. it’s hard to recover in an old with a definite intelligence.

    if it completed over bitter observe, you might be looking over an individual’s joint

    this kind of intent to that check with: “why is you think it will change these times, And when you get screwed once more, you sense twice as imprudent.

    be sure about often is the spinal linked any existing romance relationship. authorised frustrating task which include making a sandcastle: however it a lot of time set up, can be shattered very fast. And as a direct consequence, it entails much more wedding ceremony put it back up again, on the other hand may do not be exact same.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *