I get almost all of my information from official government sources, newspapers and scientific publications, and Media BIAS/Fact Check says my sources are unverifiable quackery.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming! Please help with a gift by clicking the button below.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Caleb Shaw on Red Hot Germany
- Disillusioned on World To End In Nineteen Days
- Disillusioned on World To End In Nineteen Days
- dm on World To End In Nineteen Days
- arn on Feeding The World By Starving It
Archives
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
Tony, you’ve been exposed!
Thanks to these people, now I know that your website is not aligned with the “Scientific Consensus” of fraud, deception, fear mongering, Marxism, corruption, and common idiocy.
How dare you?!!
Certainly, that is a badge of honor
Another “Badge of Honor”, Tony. Keep up the great work!
Laugh out loud at their assessment ” In general, Real Climate Science is opposed to Real Climate Science”. Clever trick on the part of MB-FC to use capital letters to try to legitimate the propaganda of NOAA-NASA-CRU and the rest.
This is one criticism of this blog I cannot fathom…
But it goes to show that the alarmists and climate suckers have nothing but words and word-play. I have seen not a single refutation of the factual presentation of temperature manipulation for example. Name calling? Yup. Facts and arguments? Nope.
Boy are they afraid of you! Big Time! Truth hurts the fallen! Keep it up!
Took me a while to find the big red & black
[HOME] [REAL CLIMATE SCIENCE]
bars at the top. Forest & Trees I guess (-:
Tony,
If you said that the sun rises in the east and sets in the west, they would “fact check” it as “quackery”. I, and I am sure others have had the experience of quoting directly from IPCC reports and still been dismissed as a denier. Fortunately I am retired so am somewhat impervious to retribution for incorrect views. One can only keep doggedly plugging away as you certainly have. I salute you!
If they’d apply those same standards to climate science
they could only call it 100% conspiracy as
result of data tampering,ice age scare,the non existing sea level rise that missed its target by more than 99% and all the other 1000 failed predicions.
LOL!
Fun they just proved NOAA and their ilk are pseudoscience quacks.
PLEASE find an alternate to Paypal. They have begun joining in the political cancellation (see Rebel News in Canada). The locomotive is gaining steam and it will be ploughing through everywhere. I already cannot watch some of your videos due to a scam copyright claim that prevents me viewing “sensitive” material with your dogs in my country.
I’m sure that Judith Currie will be thrilled to see that rates only as ‘Strong Pseudo-Science’ rating, when ‘No Tricks Zone’ has achieved your high rating of ‘Quackery’!
On the other hand that illustrious source of the ‘97% of Climate Scientists say’ – ‘Skeptical Science’ is rated “VERY HIGH”.
I think those ratings rather sum up the accuracy of ‘Media BIAS/Fact Check’ as being approximately 97% fraudulent nonsense!
(And well done Tony in earning such an accolade as you have! Obviously you’re ‘rattling cages’ …..)
P.S. I meant to say that ‘Skeptical Science’ is supposedly ‘VERY HIGH’ pro-science.
And big pink one just flew past, using its ears as wings and its tail as its propellor, whilst going ‘Oink! Oink!’
And it’s good to see that DeSmogBlog is also supposedly ‘VERY HIGH’ pro-science.
I really wonder how these people are able to sleep at night! (The late un-lamented Herr Doktor Josef Goebbels would have been very proud of them!)
No surprise there.. nearly all “fact-check” sites are left leaning and ironically their assessments are untrustworthy. The IFCN is a joke, as verifiably demonstrated by one of the only reliable fact-check sites (who actually mostly just point out IFCN members errors), Zebra:
https://www.zebrafactcheck.com/fake-accountability-international-fact-checking-network/
On this basis The Nazi propaganda minister Herman Goering would get a very high rating for factual reporting and Einstein a low rating. But what would I know in that I am a mere experienced geologist and engineer like Tony Heller and am in awe of his computer engineering skills in dealing with real data in an exemplary scientific way.
I think you meant Goebbels, but then Goering was a liar too.
Given your sources, then, this seems a ranking of the media.
Not unreasonable, in that case.
should be some way of holding them liable!!!!
They have no less-than-zero levels for “Conspiracy” or “Pseudo-Sci”? How could they then give a rating to such places like the PBS NewsHour (the most trusted news outlet evah!) or Schmidt & the Mann’s RealClimate site?
“This is a video story narrated by Tony Heller, that claims the solutions for climate change are the same as communism”
A very difficult task…
Christiana Figueres (UN):
“This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution,”
“This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history.”
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/climate-change-scare-tool-to-destroy-capitalism/
Miss Figueres must have known about Covid and the Green New Deal
years before they existed.
I wonder how.
I also wonder how a nobody can declare such a massive,world transforming thing ??
As the only way that her announcement succeeds would be a massive global conspiracy amongst top politicians,top billionaires ,top bankers
and the owners of the MSM.
This angers me greatly. As I was getting my history degree from Arkansas State University in the early 1970’s I was taught that there were two aspects to the study of history. First are the facts of history and second there is the interpretation of history. For instance, it is a fact of history that the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor in December of 1941 but there are different schools of thought on what led up to the attack. One even holds that FDR knew the attack was going to take place (which I absolutely reject). This is where the interpretation of history comes in. I have in my college textbook library a book called, “Interpretations of American History.” A fact of history is stated then essays of different schools of thought follows. It is completely legitimate to have different opinions about the facts of history.
Tony, what you do is gather the facts of history. You search out newspaper archives and other sources so you can report what happened in the past. This is what any good historian would do. These sources exist for anyone to look at. What you do is simply point people to them. There is no way this can be fact-checked as false unless the critics can prove these sources don’t exist. Good luck with that. For instance the critics are trying to claim that scientists really didn’t say in the 1970’s that the earth was descending into a new glaciation period. You have proved, by the historical record, that YES THEY DID. For me it is not just history since I lived through that time. I know first hand what was written about the cold.
You are challenging the Ministry of Truth and not letting them shove the facts of history down the Memory Hole- and they can’t stand it.