Reuters’ journalists have fact-checked Michael Mann’s hockey stick and found it to be accurate.
Email Subscribe
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Daniel Smeal on Imaginary Solutions To Imaginary Problems
- George Hilman on SEC “Climate Risk”
- Daniel Smeal on Illegal In California To Question The Opinion Of Anthony Fauci Or Bill Gates
- Gamecock on NY Times 1976 : “Cool periods produce greater climatic instability”
- GWS on Boris Admits He Is Arming Nazis In The Ukraine
Archives
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
Geez! I wonder what the IQ of the average fact checker is? I also wonder what percent of the climate scientists graduated in the last 30 years and majored in climate “science” because they were already convinced of global warming? Would that be around 99.99%? Probably.
They can’t be trusted to be objective, particularly when they advocate the alteration of data. The hockey stick does nothing other than manipulate temperature by making it a function of CO2.
How many of those so called ‘scientists’ know about the history of Earth over the last say 250 million yrs?
Ask Mark Steyn about this. Better yet, read his book, “A Disgrace To The Profession”
Michael Mann is a putz.
So it is OK to use tree ring data as long as it shows a rise in temperature, and then change to thermometer readings when it indicates a temperature drop. This is what ‘fact checkers’ call valid science. Even the IPCC has distanced itself from this nonsense.
The true believer always makes reality fit the theory. The rest is noise.
Take it easy folks, it looks like reason has won, for a change, and the toxic “green” tide is receding: https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/glasgow-climate-summit-ends-tears-failure-and-kicking-can-commitments
Alex Epstein tells it like it is https://twitter.com/i/status/1458495785218154506
I can’t remember the name of the man who said this but I believe Michael Mann sued him for libel and lost.
“Michael Mann works in Penn State but should be in the State Pen! “
You know nothing John Snow.
Seriously, who today, can validate Mann’s hockey stick? it’s wrong, wrong, wrong.
You, fact checkers, are ridiculous, and validate garbage.
It’s not because you are convinced of something that’s it’s true.
You can be convinced that the invisible pink unicorn exists, but is that true?
If 1 billion people say a mistake, it’s always a mistake.