California Governor Gavin Newsom Proclaims Natural Gas To Be Zero-Carbon
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming! Please help with a gift by clicking the button below.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Caleb Shaw on Red Hot Germany
- Disillusioned on World To End In Nineteen Days
- Disillusioned on World To End In Nineteen Days
- dm on World To End In Nineteen Days
- arn on Feeding The World By Starving It
Archives
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
If Governor Gruesome could now do this with coal, crude oil, gasoline, and diesel, it would go a long way toward fighting climate change.
I can’t even…when solar panels get to 75-100% efficient than I might think about losing my money on that expensive crap. Until then I’ll use power from Coal and Natural Gas that I get for $0.1145 a KW.
I think a 40% efficiency with perovskite solar cells that can last 50 years would be more than enough.
Perovskite is 80-90% cheaper,has reached 30% efficiency and can be printed even on glass – sadly the durability is still crap
It looks to me like gov. Newsome has given himself a “get out of jail” card by ruling natural gas to be carbon free. There is absolutely no way it can be done otherwise.
As a retired solar engineer I recall suffering through presentations at solar conference roughly 10 years ago discussing the limits to solar and wind penetration. Using very sophisticated commercial models employed by utilities, they determined the maximum is about 30%, depending on the renewable resources and utility load profile. For most electric utilities it is less.
There is certainly a place for solar and wind, especially for remote applications. For utilities it is a fuel saver, which depending on relative costs, can be advantageous. It provides a hedge on costs and should be considered as a way for a utility to diversify its production portfolio. Forcing utilities to rely only on solar and wind is not going to be helpful to those industries in the long run. Just like the big push for solar in the 1970s and the poorly thought out subsides that led to a host of fly-by-night disastrous solar installations and subsequent loss of credibility, the current push for solar and wind is not going to end well. What’s wrong with just letting the utilities utilize these resources where they truly add value without being constrained by poorly thought out government mandates?
Wind and Solar don’t work when the wind does not blow and the sunshine does not reach the Earth’s surface.
Texas found that out last February, and people died because of their political correctness.
Texas oil and gas producers converted to Solar to power their gas and oil wellhead facilities. When the sky clouded over Solar didn’t produce enough power. Wind turbines failed to generate power when the wind stopped blowing. The moisture in the pipes leading from the oil and gas wellheads, which would have never condenses if Wind and Solar had done their job, froze, blocking the transmission of oil and gas. Homes lost power and people froze to death. Businesses and jobs shutdown and folks were without food resources because grocery stores had no power.
ERCOT, which assured the governor and the state that everything would be fine, underestimated how much damage solar and wind generation failure would do to the rest of the system. They have, however, spent the last 10 months trying to spin the disaster away from renewables and to natural gas, by failing to mention that renewables powered the wellheads.
GreyGeek. I do not disagree with anything you said. My only point is that there is a role for solar and wind, it is just not anywhere near what our politicians want. It can have value as a demand side management tool, and serves as a hedge against escalating fossil fuel prices, for example when natural gas prices surge like now. A utility still needs to have sufficient capacity, plus reserves, to meet demand. Like I said, what is wrong with utility managers making the decisions and letting the chips fall where they may? It may wind up with 1% solar and wind or it may end up at over 10%. (I doubt it is much more than that in even the best conditions.)
When you make financial investments, it makes sense to diversify assets. You don’t just buy high-flying stocks, but if you’re smart you also invest in bonds, real estate and/or other assets. Solar and wind can be valuable additions but like anything else there is a limit.
If you shut down coal-fired plants and nuclear stations and rely on variable renewables, you MUST HAVE some backup, which usually comes from “peaking plants” burning gas.
The “advantages” of this policy can be seen in Germany and The UK right now. A desperate shortage of generation since both reduced their gas orders. Right now,
shut-down coal-fired stations are back running flat out (and at £4,000 a MWh at Drax, very, very profitably), and diesel generators are making lots as well.
So California had no option but to declare natural gas as ‘non-emitting’ much as the EU has with wood burning.
Newsom is a complete idiot. But probably more intelligent than those lovely people that voted for him recently
The lies (they call “science”) are increasing in absurdity and hilarity. But they (Newsom, et al) are caught between a rock and a had place, thus they’re left no recourse but to tell bigger and bigger lies.
Their current rock-and-a-hard-place dilemma is that they need to push electric vehicles in order to control people, but (oh, darn!) electric vehicles are all charged by burning natural gas. Problem solved: just issue a *royal decree* that oxidation of natural gas does not produce CO2. Furthermore, any chemistry professor who continues to teach that oxidation of natural gas produces CO2 will be labeled a domestic terrorist and/or conspiracy theorist.
This reminds me of a Louisiana state law passed many decades ago that re-defined alligators as a type of fish.