NPR Doing What They Are Paid To Do

Bill Gates has made $35 billion off the plandemic.

Updates: Billionaire Wealth, U.S. Job Losses and Pandemic Profiteers – Inequality.org

He gave NPR $25 million.

Revealed: Documents Show Bill Gates Has Given $319 Million to Media Outlets

NPR is working to create fear, hatred and prejudice against those who don’t take Bill Gate’s injection.

As COVID patients pack Colorado hospitals, anger grows against the unvaccinated : NPR

Meanwhile, across the border in Wyoming we are the least vaccinated state and COVID-19 has nearly disappeared.

A sixth of Americans have now received their COVID booster: Maine, Vermont with biggest uptake | Daily Mail Online

Have we flattened the curve in Wyoming? – Johns Hopkins

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to NPR Doing What They Are Paid To Do

  1. vax shmax says:

    Indeed, but you can’t fool all the people all the time:

    The Lancet Scolds Those Claiming “Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated” –
    https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/lancet-scolds-those-claiming-pandemic-unvaccinated

    Defund NPR!

  2. Peter Carroll says:

    I am intrigued. Why are the NPR giving over $ 3.6 million to the BBC, a publicly funded, national broadcaster, in the UK? Several possible explanations spring to mind, none of them positive.

  3. Anon says:

    If anyone is interested, this has to be the most comprehensive COVID19 / vax discussion I have ever heard. Joe Rogan covers it all… I couldn’t even begin to list the topics they discuss:

    J.R.E. (audio only)

    https://ogjre.com/episode/1747-dr-peter-mccullough

    Start it for 5 mins and you won’t be able to stop.

  4. Conrad Ziefle says:

    Well, I’ve been vaccinated 3 times. The first 2 were because I thought it would help us toward herd immunity. The third one, I buckled to family pressure. Under the same circumstances, I would do the first two again, BUT it would have been better if they had let the truth be known about the alternatives, and if the alternatives would have been abundantly available. The fact that they are not allowing access to the alternatives, even now, is grounds for massive reorganization of the government. It is criminal, and the perpetrators need to face repercussions.
    It would be nice to be able to get the therapeutics at my local drug store. Instead, I have to mail order them from India and hope they are of decent quality, and that I actually get them. Maybe it’s a new developing market for the cartel.

    • john h says:

      Conrad…”I would do the first two again”…..

      Why? Where do you ‘get’ your news?,,,,your information? Mass media?
      Did you listen to the advice of a doctor?
      What research did you do before ‘electing’ to get the injection?

      In my case, I surely knew by summer of 2020 that I was in no way going to get (((their))) warp speed…experimental injection? I read ‘alternative media’ and don’t listen much to ‘mainstream doctors’. For me the very early White House interviews with Trump. Fauci and Birx were dead giveaways of deceit and lies.

      Next was when the PCR tests were exposed as fraud when the labs used a 40+CT value guaranteeing a “positive.”

  5. An injection which is needed regularly to combat an ailment is not a vaccination, it is a medication. Do the drug companies have protection from legal action arising from harmful effects of a medication, or is their legal immunity restricted to vaccines?

    • Disillusioned says:

      Your statement and followup question are fascinating. I guess that’s why they call them boosters. How long they can legally ride in the “booster” lane without erosion of their immunity from lawsuit protection is a great question.

      • Conrad Ziefle says:

        Well, can you call it a vaccine when it shows no evidence of working against the thing it is supposed to protect against? It was tested, poorly, against the first COVID, but I don’t think they’ve had time to have tested it against the Delta, certainly not against the Omicron. So can it be called a vaccine if it shows no efficacy against them, yet is still being trotted out as a vaccine against them? If it shows no or very little efficacy, then it isn’t a vaccine, but rather it is snake oil. It and ivermectin should be tested both against a control group.

    • arn says:

      as long as their medication is called and defined as vaccine(and thats what they are lobbying for and thats what everyone calls it) they wont be held accountable.

  6. G T says:

    Those that have taken the jab are much more likely to be irrational.
    No surprise here.

  7. Karen Bracken says:

    The only solution is to get rid of the 501(c)3 tax exemptions. This should have been done decades ago when Rep. Carol Reece started up the investigations on Tax Exempt Foundations and exposed the fraud that takes place. If any organization is truly doing good work for society We The People will gladly support them. Until we end tax exempt organizations they will continue to use their wealth to bribe people to their will. We also MUST get out of the UN and all affiliates too.

Leave a Reply to john h Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.