Email Subscribe
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Conrad Ziefle on 400% Energy Inflation In Europe
- Conrad Ziefle on Geology Banned At Linked-In
- Dave Ward on 400% Energy Inflation In Europe
- ruralbob on Soros Says Democracy Is Far Right Extremism
- Rah on July 6, 1936 – Hottest Day On Record Outside Of The Southwest
Archives
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
Dessler Refuses To Debate His Junk Science
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Truth doesn’t mind being questioned.
Exactly!
His stuttering in the first 15 seconds are revealing.
Only a psychopath could stay calm in such a situation of exposure( he obviously isn’t one)while his brain is searching for a mix of coherent lies and excuses.
( remember bill gates or prince andrews reactions during the interviews when they were asked about Epstein )
The junk science readily collapses under scrutiny. The only matter that is ‘irrefutable and settled’ is the academic incompetence and corruption which promotes the garbage.
Your comment “that the junk science rapidly collapses under scrutiny” is so correct. Here in the UK the BBC and MSM refuse to enter into a process of scrutiny – indeed OFCOM (which oversees the broadcasting industry) has said journalists do not have to offer ‘balanced’ views when reporting on climate issues. So journalists become mere hacks underpinning the climate orthodoxy. It’s a disgrace.
Won’t debate the facts but happy to debate the policy…..’Don’t bother with the facts just accept I am right and do what I say’. And this guy is a professor!!!
And he sooooo nearly had a Freudian slip at the end…… “I think you overestimate the ability…
to settle these issues in a debatethe intelligence of the average person (or is it just me projecting)?The loose purse strings on climate science budgets has permitted all manner of incompetents to gain accolades and accreditation by telling their lords and masters what they want to hear. I would have said he missed his vocation serving at McDonalds, but I suspect he lacks the necessary interpersonal skills.
Every subject under the sun is debated daily, bar just one.
I wonder why that might be so?
Make that two: Climate and Covid-19.
When gas hits $4.00 a gallon in the red states, they will have no choice but to debate the science.
One of the biggest wipeouts offered by AGWers about the idea of having a debate is their claim of how unfair it would be, because they would not be able to fact-check a skeptic’s assertions in real time. Back in 2010, Barry Bickmore offered that very same lame excuse as the reason why he ducked out of a direct face-to-face debate with Lord Monckton. But the excuse is patently ridiculous, and worse, an indicator of just how weak the AGWers think their own arguments are. Think about it, if they had their ironclad points completely nailed down it would be the skeptics who flee in terror, hurling the excuse that they would not be able to fact-check the AGWers in real time.
But has any one of us ever heard that lame excuse from anyone on our side?
“If science ceases to be a rebellion against authority, then it does not deserve the talents of our brightest children.’’
– Freeman Dyson “The Scientist as a Rebel”
And they accuse Rogan of misinformation.