No Science Allowed At Climate Central

Climate Central says sea level rise at New Jersey is caused by people using fossil fuels.

Ellis Island, lighthouses among historic NJ sites flooding as seas rise | Climate Central

Sea level at New Jersey is rising at the same rate as 100 years ago, and below all of the CO2-based model scenarios.

Sea Level Trends – NOAA Tides & Currents

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to No Science Allowed At Climate Central

  1. Paul Marks says:

    Like open discussion of vaccine injuries and deaths. open discussion of the real causes of sea level rise (since the end of the last ice age) is crushed.

  2. Paul Marks says:

    The term “Partnership Journalism” is incredibly sinister. Journalists are supposed to be sceptical people, but they have been turned (via “education”) into handmaids of the powerful – pushing the establishment “narrative” on all subjects. Regardless of the subject – modern journalists (the products of “education”) never question what they are told by establishment “experts”. Essentially the cultural aspect “Agenda 2030” of the United Nations, the WEF and the rest of the establishment, has already arrived – most of the media do not question the establishment line, they just push it on ordinary people.

    For example, even GB News in the United Kingdom (the only dissenting television station – on any subject) only dissents in a few programmes (such as the programme of Mark Steyn) – in its news broadcasts it is the same as the other television stations, for example treating the words of Prince Charles during his trip to Canada as automatically true – reporting them as truth, not as a statement of his opinion. Supposedly CO2 emissions is causing the sea to rise in Canada which (“experts say”) especially threatens “indigenous people” (by which they mean tribal people) – but these indigenous people have (we are told) special knowledge, due to living in harmony with nature, which we all must learn from. The fact that these statements from His Royal Highness are clearly part of his spiritual (religious) beliefs is ignored – they are treated as statements of objective scientific truth. (although no evidence is offered for the statements). I am not saying that the spiritual and religious beliefs of Prince Charles should not be respected – but they they should not be reported as objective scientific truth, with no dissenting points of view being expressed.

    • Russell Cook says:

      “Partnership Journalism” — that’s a new one on me, so I had to look up what Climate Central meant by that, although I could have guessed in advance: ( https://www.climatecentral.org/partnership-journalism ) “Climate Central’s Partnership Journalism program collaborates with local newsrooms nationwide … we contribute data, science and data reporting, editing and guidance.”

      Their bit about “editing” is especially insidious. Imagine the howls of outrage if any organization on the skeptic side of the issue was allowed free reign to directly edit what news outlets say.

      Even within the recent year, I heard some news outlet proclaim Climate Central was non-partisan research organization, which makes me cringe every time I hear it. Back in 2012, I contributed a guest post to Steve Milloy’s JunkScience website disproving that claim, while also detailing how they scrubbed out the inconvenient truth of who their IPCC-partisan founder was: “PBS NewsHour: Climate Central a ‘research organization’; Sorry, no. They advocate solving man-caused global warming” https://junkscience.com/2012/03/pbs-newshour-climate-central-a-research-organization-sorry-no-they-advocate-solving-man-caused-global-warming/

  3. Ivan Wainwright says:

    I can only advise readers to look at the work of Emeritus Professor Wal Happer of Princeton. Happer shows clearly the physics by which CO2 causes warming of the atmosphere and that this effect was saturated at a far lower level than now prevails. Conclusion: We can shovel as much CO2 into the atmosphere as we like, but it will not cause the temperature to rise at all.

  4. Eli the Pit Bull says:

    The hacks at climate central blocked me years ago. No discussion allowed.
    We must all immediately buy EVs or were doomed they say. 90% of the raw minerals needed to meet the 2035 EV goal doesn’t even exist. But they don’t care. Their goal is eliminating the poor and middle class through starvation or freezing to death in winter.

    • David G says:

      And, of course, most EVs run on coal, but don’t tell their owners that without them sitting down first!

  5. Gamecock says:

    ‘But as climate change pushes water up along New Jersey’s coast’

    South to north? I assume the reporterette didn’t realize they were talking about higher on shore, and just parroted what she was told.

    “Ellis Island is critical to our collective story”

    They didn’t get the memo . . . our collective story must be erased. Cos reasons.

  6. GWS says:

    Any evidence of it sinking?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.