“Glaciers Might Not Be Able To Recover From Climate Change”

The press says Greenland’s Petermann Glacier is disappearing due to the use of fossil fuels and might not be able to recover.

More Damaging Than Previously Thought: Glaciers Might Not Be Able To Recover From Climate Change

Greenland’s Petermann Glacier has been growing about 1km per year for the last ten years.

EOSDIS Worldview

The surface mass balance of Greenland has been above average for four of the last six years and almost every day this summer.

Surface Conditions: Polar Portal

Over the past year there has been a large excess in the accumulated anomaly at lower elevations, where the ice is supposed to be melting.

Surface Conditions: Polar Portal

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to “Glaciers Might Not Be Able To Recover From Climate Change”

  1. Eli the Pit Bulldog says:

    Instead they are amping up the climate “disaster”
    The goal is simple, and it’s a multiple pronged approach to reduce the population either by war, chemically, or by using fear porn.
    They are winning, apparently.
    The birthrates are falling, and “they don’t know why”😵‍💫

    • Richard says:

      Birth rates are falling as education levels go up- Brazil people no longer have a foot ball team of kids- for 1000s of years the under age 5 / infant mortality rate was 45% now people are learning if you have 2 kids they have a 95% chance of seeing age 5, and now you can give more to 2 than to 12

    • Mike says:

      Birth rates are falling cuz of the Death Jab.

  2. The human-caused climate farce is a globalist agenda. Al Gore got rich(er) off trading carbon credits. And he creates a lot of the supposed evil CO2 by jetting all over the world and from the massive energy usage at his family compound. (This from Snopes, which itself is a leftist organization: In total, Gore paid nearly $30,000 in combined electricity and natural gas bills for his Nashville estate in 2006.) Obviously, CO2 isn’t really a problem. (Which is really isn’t.) Just like former president Obama having not one, but two multi-million dollar seaside homes. (Obviously, the sea-level rise won’t affect his estates.) The rich have no concern whatsoever for the poor who will have to be ever so frugal about heating in the winter, cooling in the summer, and what to buy for dinner.

    • GWS says:

      It’s all about the need to control others. Some people are obsessed with it. I think they felt weak and picked on as a child. Now it’s payback.

  3. Gamecock says:

    Do you want your yard covered in ice?

    Receding glaciers and less sea ice is GOOD!

  4. Petit_Barde says:

    But glaciers increase (in the Alpes) have induced lots of desasters :

    “The glacial flood in the Alps of Savoy in the 17th century”

    This French article dating from 1913 describes the various disasters (buried villages etc.) caused by the various advances of the glaciers in the 17th century in the Alps.

    Procession on the Steinerner Tisch organized on the initiative of the parish priest of Sölden at the Gurgler Eissee in 1718, Jakob Kopp, who led many processions, intended to eradicate the evil spell :

    It’s all a cult. The glaciers may increase or decrease, the same scamsters are prone to take glory and make profit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.