The BBC Says They Want To Talk

Climate change: How to talk to a denier – BBC News

Minnesota had no winter in 1878.

19 Mar 1878, Page 2 – Star Tribune at

That was the peak year of the AMO and tens of millions of people died around the world from the heat and drought.

Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs

A freak 1870s climate event caused drought across three continents | New Scientist

Late Victorian Holocausts: El Niño Famines and the Making of the Third World , Davis, Mike –

New South Wales recorded their hottest temperature in 1877.


It was cold during the 1970s, and scientists were talking about cooling, not warming.

January 30, 1961 – NYTimes – search nation, world, technology and Washington area news archives.

U.S. Scientist Sees New Ice Age Coming

Front Page of the New York Times, July 18, 1970. US and Soviet scientists were worried about Arctic cooling and expanding Arctic ice, and wanted to melt the Arctic by spreading coal dust on it.


U.S. and Soviet Press Studies of a Colder Arctic – The New York Times


21 Jul 1974, 13 – The Des Moines Register at

March 1, 1975 | Science News

They don’t want to talk, they want to censor.

Snopes did this hit piece on me without contacting me.  They confirmed everything I said and then said I was wrong.

Was Global Warming Data ‘Faked’ to ‘Fit Climate Change Fictions’? |

I gave  a presentation to the Washington State Senate based largely on New York Times articles. The New York Times wrote a content free hit piece without contacting me.

E.P.A. Head Stacks Agency With Climate Change Skeptics –

The Seattle Weekly wrote this hit piece without contacting me.

Climate Change Denier Testifies for 40 Minutes Before State Senate Environment Committee | Seattle Weekly

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to The BBC Says They Want To Talk

  1. Mike says:

    When they are freezing their asses off, we will laff ourselves silly at their ignorance. Great job Tony…keep it up Sir.

  2. The BBC is, by their own admission, a propaganda outlet. Only an idiot would use them as a serious source of information.

  3. Gamecock says:

    ‘Climate events’ is junk.

    You can have weather events. ‘Climate events’ shouts ignorance of what climate means.

  4. Conrad Ziefle says:

    Yeah,, they know how to speak to a climate denier. The only thing I ask is that they explain the severe heat and drought of the past before they start on how the present is different. The other thing, I wanted them to co-fund four side by side identical “containers”: one with CO2 at the level it was at in 1900. one with the current levels, one with double the current, and one with eight times the current level. These levels will be strictly maintained. Plants inside. Same amount of water in each. Exact same exposure to the sun and ambient environment. If the 1900 one is overheating then the heat can be removed to keep the plants alive. The exact same amount of heat can be removed from the other three. Run the experiment for 2 months and see what the end resulting temperatures will be, the amount of heat removed (all are by design the same), the final plant weigh of each. I’m expecting no significant temperature differences, only a greater mass of plant life in the higher concentrations of C02,

  5. Jb says:

    I remember when you posted the WA Hearings. And I’m grateful that someone (you) retained the original temp data.
    You speak the truth, backed up by data.
    They natuy want to cancel you.
    I hope you have the fortitude persist.

  6. Russell Cook says:

    To his credit, one of the BBC article authors, Marco Silva, places his email address at the bottom of the articles (the clickable link in the “Do you have a story for us? Get in touch.” line) and invites people to talk with him. He’s the guy who wrote the “Why is climate ‘doomism’ going viral – and who’s fighting it?” article ( ) back on May 22, so I emailed him directly to challenge him to ask the “Doomers” what exactly they know about the skeptic side of the issue and then report to the world what they know or don’t know. He’s responded more or less each time to my email challenges, but instead of talking and actively engaging about the issue, he’s been essentially sidestepping all around what I relay /challenge to him.

    Try challenging the guy yourselves on any skeptic point and see what he says. Ultimately, the appearance is not that it is us who are spreading disinformation, it is the BBC and he, a self-described “BBC climate disinformation specialist” (at his May 22 Doomer article) who’s doing that.

  7. Stuart Hamish says:

    Tony you are the villainized Emmanuel Goldstein of the climate alarmist movement

  8. Conrad Ziefle says:

    Did Bill Gates actually spread particulates in the atmosphere, or did he just think about it? If he actually did it, then he should be arrested for crimes against humanity. Yes, we all put particulates in the atmosphere in our daily activity, but to do it on a large scale with the intent of changing the climate has to be some kind of felonious mischief.

    • Adam says:

      I believe gates said he would abandon that idea. But whether he did actually send planes filled with chemicals into the high atmosphere, i dont know.

      But if he did he certainly wouldn’t be the 1st or last.
      Its been going on since the 50’s with gov’t s trying to use weather as a weapon in the cold war.
      Then cloud seeding trying to make it rain in drought ridden africa in the 80’s.

      And now although no gov’t will admit it (yet they acknowledge that it does happen) spraying chemicals to try and lessen the Sun’s affect is happening.
      Yet our plant life needs sunlight as much as they need CO2.

      Chemicals used Aluminium lead silver nitrite strontium barium potassium iodide silver iodide and, the real kicker, CO2 as dry ice.
      Yup, they have been seeding the high atmosphere with CO2 all the while blaming man for driving his car emitting CO2 which is causing global warming

  9. Walt Lafford says:

    Looks like Al Gore stepped in a bucket of S**T when he called climate deniers just like the police in Uvaldi Texas.

  10. Gamecock says:

    ‘They don’t want to talk, they want to censor.’

    They want you to accept their view.

    To the Left, talk or compromise is when you accept their position.

  11. Eli the Pit Bulldog says:

    The one graph with the alterations in temperature is all that’s needed to disprove the climate change theory.
    If I were president, the first thing I’d do is go back to Trump era energy policies, then hold a major news conference exposing the fraudulent data, then hold the people responsible for the fraud accountable. Everyone from Al Gore to Michael Mann.

    • spren says:

      Michael Mann is so detestable even the people ostensibly on his side don’t want anything to do with him. In his ongoing lawsuit against Mark Steyn he couldn’t get one person to come forward and sign an affidavit of support for him. I think he is just as ugly on the inside as he is on the outside.

  12. Adam says:

    The only climate change deniers are those who scream about the warming apocalypse to come (and all because of an harmless, inert, trace but much needed gas in our atmosphere)

    In fact, from what I’ve seen, the likes of Tony Heller and all us followers, we all firmly believe in climate change and understand the cycles within cycles of world climate.

    For the most part, bbc fear porn is their inability to tell the difference between weather & climate & pollution.

  13. BROWN ….Boarding School (loved it in Lake Placid well named Northwood) 1964 Geology Class (also called Rocks for Jocks) wonderful teacher Mrs. Witherall (first Female Geology Major from Cornell) at near end of Semester said there is a European Theory 1 Continent split to form present…..
    EXACTLY 10 years later 1974 PLATE TECTONICS at Brown Geology Class US Russia & China committed to no subsurface Atomic Weapons Testing….we put seismometers all over world….Tremor Tracing ensued !

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.