WE PREFER GREENLAND ICY, NOT GREEN

When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Journalists only tool for explaining climate changes is the burning of fossil fuels, so they crank out one junk science article after another.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to WE PREFER GREENLAND ICY, NOT GREEN

  1. Peter Riis says:

    Hi Tony

    Jakobshavn is not pronounced “Jakob – shaven” rather “Jacobs Havn” (you may use “haven” if pronounciation without the ‘e’ proves difficult).

    Jakobshavn means “Port of Jakob” in Danish.

    Best wishes
    PR

  2. Mahatmat says:

    Keep it up, Tony. Millions of people agree, although maybe not all of them have much enough to lose by keeping silent. Yet.

  3. Danes called Iceland that was green…Greenland was ice….Early Marketing tactic! Federalized Mi$$information…

  4. Well, the Norwegian Vikings started moving to Iceland from 870 – 930 A.D., but the main surge of Immigration to Iceland was around 1000 A.D. when the Norwegian king forced the worshippers of the Old Norse religion to either convert or die (or flee to Iceland). I’m not sure how much whisky was drunk in Norway at that time, but my guess it not enough to make Iceland attractive solely for the ice. There was no need for marketing though – as staying in Norway meant losing your head. As for Greenland, well, it was probably a marketing stunt by Erik the Red who discovered Greenland approx. 985-986 A.D., but as you should know, it was WARMER back then (1 – 2 degrees C) and it was possible to grow wheat and grass in Greenland. So, no federalized misinformation – that was only invented around 900 years later.

  5. Clarence says:

    Tony, I can’t find the graph for Greenland SMB in the Polar Portal site. Your graph shows multiple years (2017, 2018, 2019, 2020,2021 ) while the Danish site has just the 2021 and 2022 (up to date). thanks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.