Michael Mann proudly aligns himself with people like Fauci and Paul Ehrlich.
Climate scientist Michael Mann makes a home at Penn | Penn Today
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming! Please help with a gift by clicking the button below.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Colorado Wellington on Killing Cows To Save The Climate
- Greg in NZ on Red Hot Germany
- Francis Barnett on Killing Cows To Save The Climate
- James on Killing Cows To Save The Climate
- Kevin M on Red Hot Germany
Archives
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
The first thing the left does is change the definitions of words, making it deliberately impossible to reason with them. It’s a defense tactic, like moving the goal posts, or disavowing something exists, or avowing that something does exist which does not.
Anything to trip up, confuse, and snare the right in a trap of trying to defend themselves against falsehoods instead of debating the real issues at hand.
If the right doesn’t catch on pretty soon 1984 will be here sooner then we think.
the Right is Fracked with Media and DNC
Paul Ehrlich – the global cooling Paul Ehrlich?
Paul Ehrlich who made a living with failed doom and gloom predictions but was never punished for his unprofessional charlatanry because too many scientist are like Mann and Ehrlich.
Paul Ehrlich who pushed in his book ecoscience for ecofascism and forced sterilization,reduced access to energy and world population reduction to > 2 billion which is all implemented right now in the name of global warming and Covid.
(the book including that Georgia Guidestones which appeared a few years later are a good indicator for how much power the deeper state had already back then to apply such ideas on a global scale)
Considering how of Ehrlich failed it is no surprise Mann aligns with him as he is Ehrlichs successor in propaganda science and his prediction therefore as miserable.
I am glad he identifies as Ehrlich and Carson. Ehrlich’s predictions have been found to be wrong for over 40 years. And the wholesale banning of DDT has allowed mosquito-borne diseases to kill millions of people unnecessarily. Mickey is in good company.
Poor Mikie, just cannot help being wrong.
we made into the analysis of paleoclimate data proxies—like tree rings,
Nope, just found that One Tree in the forest that was different than all the others.
Paul Ehrlich, Rachel Carson, scientists before me were attacked because their message was inconvenient.
Nope, it was because their message was Wrong.
with people like Emily Falk, who uses cognitive science to understand how ideas spread.
So another Propogandist.
urban environment in Atlanta, leading to an intensification of rainfall in certain locations in the city. And guess what? Those locations are all low-income. It’s low-priced real estate because it experiences more flooding.
Cart-Horse or Horse-Cart. But it has to be Racey.
Glad to see him tied in with Dr Faulty Science.
“I glad I’m not a public health scientist.” I’m not so sure why the modifier “public” was needed, but I think I can fix the whole thing for him: “I’m glad that I’m not a scientist.”
Also attributing a false motive to those who disagree with him, trying to vilify them. It isn’t because his message is inconvenient; it’s because his message is wrong, and he alters the data to mislead people.
He makes it easy to tell whenever he is lying. His lips are moving. His answers in the interview are fantasy-world bollocks.
He spends his life trying to silence the very people he says are trying to silence him. Nobody is trying to silence him. They want to debate him *(and also would like for him to produce his work).
What a colossal wingnut. Ehrlich has never been correct about anything. Carson was a fraudulent charlatan. That’s why Mann identifies with them. What a Maroon.
Mann and his ilk are not scientists, they are political animals.
At least he has clearly identified this and the fact that the usual scientific scepticism, which a true scientist must cultivate, is instead turned into attacking and destroying those who disagree with you is now very clear.
In the past we always had Mann types on the fringes and providing they remained there, did little damage, except to their own reputations. The huge problem we now have is that these dangerous types are now holding sway and will create enormous problems and issues. Which we then have to fix as they will ride this one all the way to complete destruction if allowed.
Mann, like Carson and Ehrlich provide the pseudo-scientific justification for technocratic world government, whose agenda includes the extermination of 95% of humanity. He is a member of the same anti-humanist cult, propagating the myth that humans are destroying the planet.
I think you may have made a spelling mistake Tony.
Shouldn’t that read, Michael Mann, “defiles” himself?
Public health scientists “… have been subject to the same … kinds of attacks as the climate community because of the inconvenient nature of their findings …”
What is the INCONVENIENT nature? Fauxci et. al. were wrong about everything throughout the C19 outbreak, with one exception. The exception: He initially and correctly said masks are useless.
What are the attacks? Realists shining light on Fauxci et. al’s wrong claims, bad public health policies, stifling of dissent … Realists’ demands that Fauxci et al. be removed, for cause, from office and punished to the max extent of the law are also deemed attacks by Mann et. al.
Another unrepentant liar hits the jackpot.
This guy is an idiot. So, as evidence of his “victimhood” he cites Fauci, Rachel Carson, and Paul Erlich as fellow oppressed comrades? All three of those people were 100% spectacularly wrong about everything they’ve said for years now. Fauci is a crook and a liar. And, Erlich, in particular, has been prognosticating about the end of the world relentlessly. He seems to have developed an obsessive-compulsive fixation on imminent doomsday. However, of course, nothing catastrophic has happened. Life is a lot better now than it was back when Erlich started screaming about the apocalypse.
“Climate change” is a pseudo-science scam and a political/religious cult, and Michael Mann is the Lyndon LaRouche of the cult.
Mike Mann is so wrong it is difficult to believe that he cannot see the stupidity of his own statements.
Has Michael Mann read the FEE article damning Rachel Carson’s death dealing hostility to DDT : ” Millions Died Thanks To The Mother Of Environmentalism ” ……Is he aware of Faucis strange ideas on the contagiousness of HIV AIDS in the 1980’s or that Paul Ehrlich espoused policies tantamount to eugenics ? . …Who else occupies pride of place in the “long lineage of scientists ” whose message was inconvenient ? Trofim Lysenko ?.. .Mike Mann is not a brave torch-bearing martyr of scientific integrity. Rather he is on the side of the “powerful interests that would shut up dissenting scientists and doctors and “keep them out somehow ” even if they have “to redefine what the scientific literature is “