`Have you guessed the riddle yet?? the Hatter said, turning to Alice again.
`No, I give it up,? Alice replied: `what’s the answer?? `
I haven’t the slightest idea,? said the Hatter.
Do climate academics actually believe the nonsense they write?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Engineering
- The World’s Worst Scientists
- “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- A Real Hockey Stick
- A Real Hockey Stick
- Doubling Energy Costs
- Doubling Energy Costs
- “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Australia Permanent Drought Update
- Let Them Burn Wood
- “New computer modeling”
- Climate Destroying Shrimp
- What’s At Stake?
- Too Hot To Live
- What’s At Stake?
- “The world began to end on 12th May 2024”
- “Climate change is a myth”
- Racist Gas
- RFK Jr. Discusses The Green New Deal And Climate
- “world is on edge of climate abyss, UN warns”
- Ivy Echo Chamber
- Climate Homicide
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
Recent Comments
- Richard E Fritz on Doubling Energy Costs
- Richard E Fritz on A Real Hockey Stick
- Richard E Fritz on The World’s Worst Scientists
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Engineering
- Ivan G Wainwright on Climate Engineering
- Russell Cook on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Bruce of Newcastle on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Conrad Ziefle on The World’s Worst Scientists
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Francis Barnett on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
Now that’s the comeback of the century
as Aerosols were blamed for the Ice Age of the 70ies
and then forgotten when global cooling was replaced by global warming.
Never waste a good lie.
Climate science is approaching full circle.
Hmmm. Notice the names of the authors.
None of them is paying Biden directly.
Bingo and BOOM!
Handle crank a model and simply believe the results. No attempt to explain why the results are what they are, what the cause-effect relationships implicit in them are, or indeed whether they are merely artifacts of the algorithm behaviour. Typical climate pseudo-science. To err is human, but to really screw up, you need a computer.