The US has cooled considerably since the 1930s. This doesn’t suit the political agenda, so NOAA and NASA tamper with the data to turn cooling into warming.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The World’s Worst Scientists
- “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- A Real Hockey Stick
- A Real Hockey Stick
- Doubling Energy Costs
- Doubling Energy Costs
- “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Australia Permanent Drought Update
- Let Them Burn Wood
- “New computer modeling”
- Climate Destroying Shrimp
- What’s At Stake?
- Too Hot To Live
- What’s At Stake?
- “The world began to end on 12th May 2024”
- “Climate change is a myth”
- Racist Gas
- RFK Jr. Discusses The Green New Deal And Climate
- “world is on edge of climate abyss, UN warns”
- Ivy Echo Chamber
- Climate Homicide
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
- Trained Not To Learn
Recent Comments
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Francis Barnett on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Steve Cooksey on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- spren on “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Jack the Insider on Doubling Energy Costs
- Conrad Ziefle on Doubling Energy Costs
- Disillusioned on Doubling Energy Costs
- Francis Barnett on Doubling Energy Costs
- Disillusioned on “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
Pulling a few years off the NOAA site for Annual Global Temperatures for the following years, they show –
(1) The Climate of 1997 – Annual Global Temperature Index “The global average temperature of 62.45 degrees Fahrenheit for 1997” = 16.92°C.
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/1997/13
(2) http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/199813
Global Analysis – Annual 1998 – Does not give any “Annual Temperature” but the 2015 report does state “The annual temperature anomalies for 1997 and 1998 were 0.51°C (0.92°F) and 0.63°C (1.13°F), respectively, above the 20th century average,” So 1998 was 0.63°C – 0.51°C = 0.12°C warmer than 1997
62.45 degrees Fahrenheit for 1997″ = 16.92°C + 0.12°C = for 1998 = 17.04°C
(3) For 2010, the combined global land and ocean surface temperature tied with 2005 as the warmest such period on record, at 0.62°C (1.12°F) above the 20th century average of 13.9°C (57.0°F). 0.62°C + 13.9°C = 14.52°C
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201013
(4) 2013 ties with 2003 as the fourth warmest year globally since records began in 1880. The annual global combined land and ocean surface temperature was 0.62°C (1.12°F) above the 20th century average of 13.9°C (57.0°F). Only one year during the 20th century—1998—was warmer than 2013.
0.62°C + 13.9°C = 14.52°C
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201313
(5) 2014 annual global land and ocean surfaces temperature “The annually-averaged temperature was 0.69°C (1.24°F) above the 20th century average of 13.9°C (57.0°F)= 0.69°C above 13.9°C => 0.69°C + 13.9°C = 14.59°C
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2014/13
(6) 2015 – the average global temperature across land and ocean surface areas for 2015 was 0.90°C (1.62°F) above the 20th century average of 13.9°C (57.0°F)
=> 0.90°C + 13.9°C = 14.80°C
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201513
For 2016 and they report average temperature across the world’s land and ocean surfaces was 58.69 Fahrenheit 14.83°C
Report for 2022 was the sixth warmest year since global records began in 1880 at 0.86°C (1.55°F) above the 20th century average of 13.9°C (57.0°F). This value is 0.13°C (0.23°F) less than the record set in 2016
=> 0.86°C + 13.9°C = 14.76°C
So the results are 16.92 or 17.04 are less than 14.52 or 14.52 or 14.59 or 14.80 or 14.83 or 14.76 using data written at the time.
Also 2010 ties with 2005 @ 14.52°C which is what 2013 and 2003 are at. But 2010 is a record and 2013, 3 years later, is only the 4th warmest?
They cannot even keep the same 20th century average of 15.6°C or 15.8°C or 14.8°C or 13.9°C the same 20+ years after it was over?
Thanks to Nick at WUWT for the original find.
So what if the average for one year or several years was greater than the average for 100 years? That is what average is all about, some greater, some less, make an average. And given that they doctored the data, I don’t believe it is actually greater in those years.
Has anybody used/seen this website which purports to take temperature data from thousands of measuring sites, process it and come up with a daily global temperature, a nd then conpares it with a 30 year mean?
I tried to find out who or what is running the site but it’s all secret squirrel.
https://temperature.global/
From where did Tony Heller take the “E” ajusted codes at 3 minutes of video?
Does anyone have the link from Tony Heller took that picture?
From where did Tony Heller take the codes with “E” from Estimated, at 3 minutes of video?
Does anyone have the link from Tony Heller took that picture?