On March 20, 1907 California was flooded and it was 102 degrees in Oklahoma.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
Recent Comments
- arn on UK Officially Sucks
- Bob G on UK Officially Sucks
- Russell Cook on UK Officially Sucks
- Margaret Smith on UK Officially Sucks
- gordon vigurs on UK Officially Sucks
- arn on UK Officially Sucks
- Terry Shipman on UK Officially Sucks
- Independent on UK Officially Sucks
- arn on Crime In Washington DC
- Bob G on Apparently People Like Warm Weather
If you look at the following data which goes back to 1850, there seems to be a strong increase of ocean and land temperature in the last 40 years, starting in the 1980s compared to all the data since 1850. The question is of course: Is the data reliable? Assuming it is, then there has been a strong increase in world temperature since 1980 with no end in sight… I would like to hear your opinion. Thank you from Bavaria!
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/climate-at-a-glance/global/time-series/globe/land/3/7/1850-2023
What would cause you to assume that NOAA data are reliable?
Yes, exactly how can I verify that the data is correct? Do you have reliable information that their data is incorrect?
Are you new here? You are at the source right now. Do some digging.