On March 20, 1907 California was flooded and it was 102 degrees in Oklahoma.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
Recent Comments
- Francis Barnett on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- dearieme on “even within the lifetime of our children”
- John Francis on The Anti-Greta
- John Francis on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Luigi on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Bob G on The Anti-Greta
If you look at the following data which goes back to 1850, there seems to be a strong increase of ocean and land temperature in the last 40 years, starting in the 1980s compared to all the data since 1850. The question is of course: Is the data reliable? Assuming it is, then there has been a strong increase in world temperature since 1980 with no end in sight… I would like to hear your opinion. Thank you from Bavaria!
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/climate-at-a-glance/global/time-series/globe/land/3/7/1850-2023
What would cause you to assume that NOAA data are reliable?
Yes, exactly how can I verify that the data is correct? Do you have reliable information that their data is incorrect?
Are you new here? You are at the source right now. Do some digging.