This organic gardener is worried about the “carbon footprint” of gardening.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- UK Net Zero
- Erasing 1921
- “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Warming Toledo
- One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Cold Hurricanes
- Plant Food
- President Trump Gets Every Question Right
- The Inflation Reduction Act
- Saving The Ecosystem
- Two Weeks Past The End Of The World
- Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
- More Proof Of Global Warming
- Shutting Down The Climate
- ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Warming Twice As Fast
- Understanding Climate Science
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
Recent Comments
- Independent on UK Net Zero
- Francis Barnett on Erasing 1921
- william on UK Net Zero
- Robertvd on Erasing 1921
- dearieme on Erasing 1921
- Tel on President Trump Gets Every Question Right
- Bob G on Warming Toledo
- Bob G on “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Bob G on Erasing 1921
- Scott Allen on Erasing 1921
The wisdom of living in medieval times may work in your little hobby garden, but on the grand scale of a functioning farm it is impractical. I do as he does, not because I’m afraid of modern technology, but because I need additional soil every year. And I produce enough vegetables to provide for every dinner during the summer, and maybe 30 pints of canned stuff during the year. We would starve if that were all we had to eat.
Virtue Signalling is a mental illness.
(btw – I wonder how it went for Sri Lankias people when they were forced into a similar kind of gardening by the globalist carbon Mafia)
So, if you can keep it fully organic and fully natural, the process is much easier for the environment and much easier for the garden.
But, “the process” is still somewhat hard on the environment?!? That rock obviously does not understand “the process.”
First – The plants he grows, whether naturally or fertilized, produce the counter agent of carbon dioxide. Surely he knows that. Surely. No?
Second – There is no science shows carbon dioxide to be detrimental to the environment.
Any carbon footprint conversation is bat-sh*t-crazy anti-science.
edit: After “fertilized,” I left out that the plants he grows absorb carbon dioxide, which would make a net reduction to his fantasy carbon [dioxide] footprint.