This organic gardener is worried about the “carbon footprint” of gardening.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- arn on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- Bob G on CO2²
- Bob G on CO2²
- conrad ziefle on CO2²
- arn on CO2²
The wisdom of living in medieval times may work in your little hobby garden, but on the grand scale of a functioning farm it is impractical. I do as he does, not because I’m afraid of modern technology, but because I need additional soil every year. And I produce enough vegetables to provide for every dinner during the summer, and maybe 30 pints of canned stuff during the year. We would starve if that were all we had to eat.
Virtue Signalling is a mental illness.
(btw – I wonder how it went for Sri Lankias people when they were forced into a similar kind of gardening by the globalist carbon Mafia)
So, if you can keep it fully organic and fully natural, the process is much easier for the environment and much easier for the garden.
But, “the process” is still somewhat hard on the environment?!? That rock obviously does not understand “the process.”
First – The plants he grows, whether naturally or fertilized, produce the counter agent of carbon dioxide. Surely he knows that. Surely. No?
Second – There is no science shows carbon dioxide to be detrimental to the environment.
Any carbon footprint conversation is bat-sh*t-crazy anti-science.
edit: After “fertilized,” I left out that the plants he grows absorb carbon dioxide, which would make a net reduction to his fantasy carbon [dioxide] footprint.