This organic gardener is worried about the “carbon footprint” of gardening.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Cheering Crowds
- Gordon Vigurs on Cheering Crowds
- GW on Cheering Crowds
- Luigi on 70C At Lisbon
- Richard E Fritz on Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- D. Boss on Cheering Crowds
- D. Boss on Cheering Crowds
- D. Boss on Cheering Crowds
- Bob G on Cheering Crowds
- GW on Cheering Crowds
The wisdom of living in medieval times may work in your little hobby garden, but on the grand scale of a functioning farm it is impractical. I do as he does, not because I’m afraid of modern technology, but because I need additional soil every year. And I produce enough vegetables to provide for every dinner during the summer, and maybe 30 pints of canned stuff during the year. We would starve if that were all we had to eat.
Virtue Signalling is a mental illness.
(btw – I wonder how it went for Sri Lankias people when they were forced into a similar kind of gardening by the globalist carbon Mafia)
So, if you can keep it fully organic and fully natural, the process is much easier for the environment and much easier for the garden.
But, “the process” is still somewhat hard on the environment?!? That rock obviously does not understand “the process.”
First – The plants he grows, whether naturally or fertilized, produce the counter agent of carbon dioxide. Surely he knows that. Surely. No?
Second – There is no science shows carbon dioxide to be detrimental to the environment.
Any carbon footprint conversation is bat-sh*t-crazy anti-science.
edit: After “fertilized,” I left out that the plants he grows absorb carbon dioxide, which would make a net reduction to his fantasy carbon [dioxide] footprint.