If people worried about global warming spent more time outdoors, perhaps they would have a more realistic view of the world.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Timo, Not that one on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- william on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
Someone suggested that if any of these lamebrained governments actually sued the oil companies, then the oil companies (energy companies, because they invest in all forms of energy production) should immediately stop selling oil products within the jurisdiction of that governmental entity. Maybe post some ads in the papers explaining why they stopped.
YouTube still persists with that Wikipedia definition of global warming. The IPPC definition is of the difference between outgoing and incoming radiation. Whilst this might be possible transiently, if integrated up over time, such a discrepancy would credit greenhouse gases with the magical property of generating energy from nothing. I find it strange how ‘;irrefutable settled science’ contravenes what is probably the most fundamental principle of physics.
the entire fundamental physics and science is out the window- the IPCC- Bernie AOC Horse face Kerry & entire DNC and EU want POWER and Control
The difference between incoming energy and outgoing energy is the energy gain or loss of the system. When you look at Earth, the energy gain or loss would be hard to figure out. How much energy does Earth have, to its core? How much heat gain, if you can decide what that is, is from the sun, and how much is not really gain, but just a transfer from the core outward? Can you really measure the outflow of energy from the system when you can’t model clouds accurately, and that is just one mechanism that is poorly modeled? In the end, these climate shamans just look like a whack-a-mole (not is a chemical way) Dr. Seuss character.
Since “climate change” is attributed to world-wide CO2 emissions, then Vermont is attempting to hold the entire world responsible for Vermont. What a bunch of maroons.