Overloading the atmosphere with carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels is heating the planet, shrinking the Arctic ice cap, melting glaciers and raising sea levels. It is leading to more widespread drought, more frequent heat waves and more powerful hurricanes.
Just curious if any of you have actually read the paper Trenberth is referring to in this email, which clearly explains exactly what he’s talking about here, which is not “global warming has stopped” or anything even remotely similar?
Actually, you don’t even have to read the whole paper. The abstract is enough.
Here’s a clue: global warming is not restricted to the atmosphere. If more heat is being trapped by higher levels of greenhouse gases, and it’s not in the atmosphere, then it must be somewhere else. Now consider whether or not the question “where the heck is global warming?” could be read differently than the way you’ve been reading it.
Keep them coming and keep ClimateGate alive.
AGW is a hoax but Climate Fraud is REAL.
More lies from Mann.
Overloading the atmosphere with carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels is heating the planet, shrinking the Arctic ice cap, melting glaciers and raising sea levels. It is leading to more widespread drought, more frequent heat waves and more powerful hurricanes.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/07/AR2010100705484.html
A little progress… he said only Arctic cap was shrinking lol instead of polar caps….
Just curious if any of you have actually read the paper Trenberth is referring to in this email, which clearly explains exactly what he’s talking about here, which is not “global warming has stopped” or anything even remotely similar?
Actually, you don’t even have to read the whole paper. The abstract is enough.
Here’s a clue: global warming is not restricted to the atmosphere. If more heat is being trapped by higher levels of greenhouse gases, and it’s not in the atmosphere, then it must be somewhere else. Now consider whether or not the question “where the heck is global warming?” could be read differently than the way you’ve been reading it.
“We can’t account for the lack of warming”
Yes. What did he mean by that? Have you read the paper?