Too Smart To Debate

Stephen Hale: Global-warming skeptics equivalent of Flat Earth Society

I read with disappointment the Aug. 5 Commentary piece by Steve Goreham “(Why the climate models of global warming are wrong”) and the Aug. 22 one by Mike Stenhouse (“Climate alarms deny the reality in R.I.”).

The real question is not whether global climate change and destabilization by human-caused carbon dioxide emissions are happening (as accepted by 97 percent of the people who have the expertise to answer this question, the planet’s climate scientists).

His only piece of information is Cook’s fraudulent 97% number.

Instead, the question is why The Journal publishes commentary by climate change deniers such as Goreham and Stenhouse, with their usual statements that are often factually wrong and, rather than shed light on a complex topic, only serve to confuse the public. Why doesn’t The Journal give similar coverage to the Flat Earth Society?

http://www.providencejournal.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/20130903-stephen-hale-global-warming-skeptics-equivalent-of-flat-earth-society.ece

ScreenHunter_173 Sep. 03 21.36

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Too Smart To Debate

  1. Karl says:

    He’s smart alright. In his brief rant he used the AGW standard points of argument: 1) appeal to authority and 2) Ad Hominem

    Steve, you would clean this idiot’s clock.

  2. Don says:

    Hitler or Stalin would be proud of these folks.

  3. Chewer says:

    You have an army of professionals with credentials, experience and wisdom that have your back and have stepped forward, Steve!

  4. tom0mason says:

    A piece written with such conviction and insight that Joseph Goebbels would be proud.

  5. Bob Greene says:

    Climate change denier. Is that someone who denies the climate is changing or someone who believes they can keep the climate from changing?

  6. Chuck L says:

    Like most AGW believers, “Stephen Hale” is a coward and would never have the b@lls to engage in a true debate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *