In 2011, NOAA made numerous false claims about record heat in Oklahoma. The summers of 1936 and 1934 were hotter, and the trend is down since the 1930s.
There are thirty-three Oklahoma HCN stations which have been continuously active since 1930. Only one set their all-time record maximum temperature in 2011, compared to twenty-four in 1936.
Oklahoma summer maximum temperatures are down two degrees since the 1930s.
Index of /pub/data/ghcn/daily/hcn/
Station Number Record Max Date USC00340179 1936.63 USC00340256 1936.69 USC00340292 1936.69 USC00340593 1936.7 USC00340908 1998.57 USC00341243 2002.5 USC00341724 1936.69 USC00341828 1936.63 USC00342678 1936.69 USC00342912 1936.69 USC00342944 1953.53 USC00343497 1936.69 USC00343628 2011.57 USC00343821 1936.69 USC00344055 1922.73 USC00344235 1936.69 USC00344298 1911.56 USC00344573 1936.69 USC00344861 1936.69 USC00345063 1936.69 USC00345509 1936.69 USC00345779 1936.69 USC00345855 1954.61 USC00346130 1936.69 USC00346139 1917.52 USC00346278 1954.61 USC00346638 1936.69 USC00346670 1936.63 USC00346926 1936.69 USC00346935 1936.63 USC00347012 1936.69 USC00348501 1936.69 USC00349422 1936.69
It’s called “Global Warming”..not “Oklahoma Warming”
(Censored by stevengoddard so as protect his alternate reality bubble)
So why did NOAA try to use Oklahoma as proof of global warming?
“In 2011, NOAA made numerous false claims about record heat in Oklahoma”
And yet you mention (nor link) to none of their supposed claims ….Why? .. straw men are easy to knock over I suppose ..
“So why did NOAA try to use Oklahoma as proof of global warming?”
Why do you fear posting what NOAA actually said..? At the very least post something out of context (standard denier practice) so that we can get to what they actually did say… .
Why? Because I have mentioned them about two dozen times in the past.
You show up here and start attacking people without even bothering to read the blog. What a wanker.
Methinks the jig is up.
If the “global warming” were at all real, Oklahoma would be setting and matching high temperature records like a pair of rabbits multiplying…..
Ain’t happening.
“Because I have mentioned them about two dozen times in the past.”
Then it should have been easy for you to link to..
….but I can understand you not wanting to.. Likely no one challenged you on those misrepresented claims.. .
So.. which one is it.. http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/?s=noaa+oklahoma
You are off to good start.
Expertly dodged. .. … ..
You have yet to say anything intelligent here.
[snip. content free posts are not tolerated from you]
[snip]
Censorship:… the right-wing extremist’s best defense against self-examination..
Do you look at, or understand the graphs I presented above? Anyone with an IQ over 30 should be able to understand that Oklahoma used to be much hotter.
That’s not the point and any honest person would agree… … The average temperature of Oklahoma over that period of time says no more about Global Warming than the two digit IQs of a Tea Party bund rally says about human intelligence.. However if one gathers data from dozens of sources across several scientific disciplines the reality of AGW emerges… .. This is why the denier picks isolated incidences such as Oklahoma.. the uneducated are easily convinced with such logical fallacies and misrepresenting of data..
Looking back at a couple of pieces concerning Oklahoma temps.. I see that a few others have also taken you to the woodshed over the misrepresenting of NOAA data and yet you still claim that the Earth is flat.. Proof that the denier’s problem is more deeply rooted than his anti-science stance.
You have no idea what you are talking about. You repeat phrases you don’t understand and are driven by nothing more than bigotry.