Last year at this time – the expert opinion.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Tel on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Petit_Barde on Ellen Flees To The UK
- dm on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Gamecock on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Polar Bears
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Richard E Fritz on HUD Climate Advisor
Keep them coming and keep ClimateGate alive.
AGW is a hoax but Climate Fraud is REAL.
More lies from Mann.
Overloading the atmosphere with carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels is heating the planet, shrinking the Arctic ice cap, melting glaciers and raising sea levels. It is leading to more widespread drought, more frequent heat waves and more powerful hurricanes.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/07/AR2010100705484.html
A little progress… he said only Arctic cap was shrinking lol instead of polar caps….
Just curious if any of you have actually read the paper Trenberth is referring to in this email, which clearly explains exactly what he’s talking about here, which is not “global warming has stopped” or anything even remotely similar?
Actually, you don’t even have to read the whole paper. The abstract is enough.
Here’s a clue: global warming is not restricted to the atmosphere. If more heat is being trapped by higher levels of greenhouse gases, and it’s not in the atmosphere, then it must be somewhere else. Now consider whether or not the question “where the heck is global warming?” could be read differently than the way you’ve been reading it.
“We can’t account for the lack of warming”
Yes. What did he mean by that? Have you read the paper?