Last year at this time – the expert opinion.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Bill on Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Gamecock on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Gamecock on “pushing nature past its limits”
- William on Mission Accomplished
- Gordon Vigurs on Mission Accomplished
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- Bob G on Mission Accomplished
- James Snook on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- czechlist on Mission Accomplished
- arn on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
Keep them coming and keep ClimateGate alive.
AGW is a hoax but Climate Fraud is REAL.
More lies from Mann.
Overloading the atmosphere with carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels is heating the planet, shrinking the Arctic ice cap, melting glaciers and raising sea levels. It is leading to more widespread drought, more frequent heat waves and more powerful hurricanes.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/07/AR2010100705484.html
A little progress… he said only Arctic cap was shrinking lol instead of polar caps….
Just curious if any of you have actually read the paper Trenberth is referring to in this email, which clearly explains exactly what he’s talking about here, which is not “global warming has stopped” or anything even remotely similar?
Actually, you don’t even have to read the whole paper. The abstract is enough.
Here’s a clue: global warming is not restricted to the atmosphere. If more heat is being trapped by higher levels of greenhouse gases, and it’s not in the atmosphere, then it must be somewhere else. Now consider whether or not the question “where the heck is global warming?” could be read differently than the way you’ve been reading it.
“We can’t account for the lack of warming”
Yes. What did he mean by that? Have you read the paper?