Wrong way
Right Way
One of these two scientists is thinking clearly about the future. Which one gets funding? Which one gets asked some very difficult questions?
Wrong way
Right Way
One of these two scientists is thinking clearly about the future. Which one gets funding? Which one gets asked some very difficult questions?
All scientists are skeptics. Alarmists are not skeptics, therefore they are not scientists. Curry is a skeptic therefore she is a true scientist, even though she hasnt denied CAGW couldnt happen.
Hansen is an arch-alarmist, therefore he is not a scientist. And the rest of GISS are just his bulldogs who cant shoot straight.
Which ones should I trust?