Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on Worst March Drought On Record
- Robertvd on Worst March Drought On Record
- Bob G on Worst March Drought On Record
- GW on The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Don B on Worst March Drought On Record
- Ulric Lyons on Worst March Drought On Record
- conrad ziefle on The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- conrad ziefle on The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- D. Boss on The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Bob G on The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
Left-Wing Press Getting Increasingly Desperate
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.


a better observation of the climate…
Do all of these guys just work with GISS
Sure, but can the guy accurately predict next week’s weather? Didn’t think so.
http://libertyatstake.blogspot.com/
“Because the Only Good Progressive is a Failed Progressive”
You can know with absolute certainty that when the LA Times plays the “evangelical Christian” card it’s for purely political reasons.
Why do I smell a rat in how this LA Times article was written?
He remembers thinking it ridiculous when a noted climatologist told Congress in 1988 that he was all but certain that the climate was changing.
He means this 1988 guy?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhTxM2ith5k
Emanuel sees himself as a conservative. He believes marriage is between a man and a woman. He backs a strong military. He almost always votes Republican and admires Ronald Reagan.
You’re right, they are desperate.
Horribly desperate. Conservatives? Even Christians in the article? Yeh huh, and they characterize skeptics as “denying the climate is changing?”