Bush admits U.S. has big role in global warming
Tuesday, June 12, 2001By Ann McFeatters, Post-Gazette National Bureau
WASHINGTON — After the White House admitted badly handling its abrogation of the global warming treaty, President Bush yesterday conceded as he left for his first diplomatic trip to Europe that the United States is a major player in heating up the Earth.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Bel Air Fire Of 1961
- The Thing Of The Past
- “‘extremely unlikely’ without climate change, says scientists”
- Holocene Optimum In Alaska
- ‘Two incredible extreme events’
- The End Of Snow
- Google Maps Adds Context
- Thing Of The Past Update
- Expert Government Forecasting
- Thing Of The Past Comes To England
- “far outside the range of observed variability”
- African Desertification
- Grok Explains Polar Bears
- The Climate Denial Money Machine
- President Trump : “decisively defeat the climate hysteria hoax.”
- New Plan To Rob The Citizenry
- “Fifteen days to flatten the curve”
- Warm December 1923
- “Ensure No One Is Above the Law”
- The Best Electric Cars
- Honeybee Collapse Update
- “a live-animal market in Wuhan, China.”
- Fifteen Year Old Children In Australia Control The Weather
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
Recent Comments
- Robertvd on The Bel Air Fire Of 1961
- Robertvd on The Bel Air Fire Of 1961
- Bob G on The Bel Air Fire Of 1961
- Bob G on The Thing Of The Past
- conrad ziefle on The Thing Of The Past
- Peter Carroll on Expert Government Forecasting
- GW on The Thing Of The Past
- Gamecock on The Thing Of The Past
- GW on The Thing Of The Past
- Disillusioned on The Thing Of The Past
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has for years contended that $1.4 million annually to monitor carbon dioxide is not enough…
It’s always been so: Just start out with the presumption that it’s a money grab, and everything anybody does, anywhere, makes complete and total sense (with the possible exception that, at times, it’s difficult to think they’d really believe they’d get away with it).
Start out with the presumption that the people who say global warming is hurting the Earth, really do think global warming is hurting the Earth…and a whole lot of things don’t make sense. Unsolved mysteries galore. The pieces don’t fall into places until you assume it’s a big fat gravy train, and then everything fits.
So the difference between Republicans and Democrats in global warming is what? Good thing Rush Limbaugh doesn’t like Al Gore of there would be no difference.
At least Bush didn’t implement the Kyoto pact in spite of intense criticism. I give him credit for that. Also, Republicans are the only party that contains any sceptics at all so they’re the lesser of two evils.
The difference between establishment Repubilcans and Demonrats is the speed that total government control is established “Bomb-throwers” on the Repub side are the people that want to get rid of unnecessesary or destructive government agencies (ie Big Sis’s department, the EPA, Department of Education, ATF, list is endless). “Bomb-Throwers” on the Democrat side are just that. Course the Demonrat bomb-throwers now wear suits and run Government agencies now.
It’s hard to blame Bush or anyone else back then who was taken in. Practically everyone was taken in to some extent, because for awhile there actually was some warming taking place. But as the alarmists became increasingly shrill, the warming stopped.