Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Earth On Fire
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
Recent Comments
- Greg in NZ on Earth On Fire
- arn on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- William on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- William on Earth On Fire
- arn on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- Mike on NPR Climate Experts
- Mike on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- mwhite on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- Bob G on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
“unleashed”…sounds about right…
Ah.. the consensus argument yet again. It’s shame these journalists appear to have never heard of Galileo, Einstein, nor of the Scientific Method.
Junk journalism at its best.. or worst, depending on how one looks at it.
Except that in this case, it is even worse. There were only 75 scientists that made up the so-called 97% consensus … the consensus odds were stacked much, much higher against Galileo and Einstein, as I am sure they had at least an 80+ person consensus against them!
97% of climate scientists are apparently feeding at the trough. If nothing is happening, how do they justify their salaries?
That would be ALL 75 of them …
Quite the picture. How can warmer temps. cause melting ice and lower seas at the same time?
If you have to ask that question you have not known anyone who has taken the “Magical Mystery Tour” of the climatology world!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7F2X3rSSCU
Then you have this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA_sVHBNcOU&feature=related
If you do not understand the lyrics of this Climatology song:
“Roll up, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up AND THAT’S AN INVITATION, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up TO MAKE A RESERVATION, roll up for the mystery tour.
The magical mystery tour is waiting to take you away,
Waiting to take you away.
Roll up, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up WE’VE GOT EVERYTHING YOU NEED, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up SATISFACTION GUARANTEED, roll up for the mystery tour.
The magical mystery tour is hoping to take you away,
Hoping to take you away.
Roll up, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up AND THAT’S AN INVITATION, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up TO MAKE A RESERVATION, roll up for the mystery tour.
The magical mystery tour is coming to take you away,
Coming to take you away.
The magical mystery tour is dying to take you away,
Dying to take you away, take you away.
http://taz4158.tripod.com/magical.html
That at least was back in the day when music was really music! Long way down from there to Black Eyed Peas.
That’s a chick? YIKES!
Nicole Hodgson lectures in sustainability at Murdoch University, Western Australia.She is am also the President of the Conservation Council of WA (www.ccwa.org.au) and has a background with NGOs in the sustainability and environmental area.
http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/nicole-hodgson-2778404.html
What a surprise, Ms. Nicole is on the AGW gravy train.
Maybe if she had a makeover she wouldn’t need to preoccupy herself with this climate nonsense.
So, am I to assume that ALL 75 of those “climate consensus scientists” are to be wrong? … I see what she means. I don’t see how that is plausible. All 75 of them? .. come on… /sarc