Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
Recent Comments
- dearieme on Diversity Is Our Strength
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Crashex on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on Diversity Is Our Strength
- GeologyJim on Diversity Is Our Strength
- Bill Odom on “a persistent concern”
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- conrad ziefle on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Francis Barnett on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- dearieme on “even within the lifetime of our children”
“unleashed”…sounds about right…
Ah.. the consensus argument yet again. It’s shame these journalists appear to have never heard of Galileo, Einstein, nor of the Scientific Method.
Junk journalism at its best.. or worst, depending on how one looks at it.
Except that in this case, it is even worse. There were only 75 scientists that made up the so-called 97% consensus … the consensus odds were stacked much, much higher against Galileo and Einstein, as I am sure they had at least an 80+ person consensus against them!
97% of climate scientists are apparently feeding at the trough. If nothing is happening, how do they justify their salaries?
That would be ALL 75 of them …
Quite the picture. How can warmer temps. cause melting ice and lower seas at the same time?
If you have to ask that question you have not known anyone who has taken the “Magical Mystery Tour” of the climatology world!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7F2X3rSSCU
Then you have this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA_sVHBNcOU&feature=related
If you do not understand the lyrics of this Climatology song:
“Roll up, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up AND THAT’S AN INVITATION, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up TO MAKE A RESERVATION, roll up for the mystery tour.
The magical mystery tour is waiting to take you away,
Waiting to take you away.
Roll up, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up WE’VE GOT EVERYTHING YOU NEED, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up SATISFACTION GUARANTEED, roll up for the mystery tour.
The magical mystery tour is hoping to take you away,
Hoping to take you away.
Roll up, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up AND THAT’S AN INVITATION, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up TO MAKE A RESERVATION, roll up for the mystery tour.
The magical mystery tour is coming to take you away,
Coming to take you away.
The magical mystery tour is dying to take you away,
Dying to take you away, take you away.
http://taz4158.tripod.com/magical.html
That at least was back in the day when music was really music! Long way down from there to Black Eyed Peas.
That’s a chick? YIKES!
Nicole Hodgson lectures in sustainability at Murdoch University, Western Australia.She is am also the President of the Conservation Council of WA (www.ccwa.org.au) and has a background with NGOs in the sustainability and environmental area.
http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/nicole-hodgson-2778404.html
What a surprise, Ms. Nicole is on the AGW gravy train.
Maybe if she had a makeover she wouldn’t need to preoccupy herself with this climate nonsense.
So, am I to assume that ALL 75 of those “climate consensus scientists” are to be wrong? … I see what she means. I don’t see how that is plausible. All 75 of them? .. come on… /sarc