New ice will start forming in eight weeks. Better send your oil tanker through now, while the ice is only three metres thick.
http://www.arctic.io/observations/8/2011-07-14/5-N84.292361-E166.076215
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
- EPA Climate Change Arrest
Recent Comments
- arn on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- czechlist on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Jehzsa on “pushing nature past its limits”
- arn on Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- dm on Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- dm on “pushing nature past its limits”
So let’s see, I once challenged you to predict the state of the Arctic ice cap in 2020 and you answered by going all over the map. “It will expand, shrink or stay the same”, you said.
Yet, it seems like you keep wanting to believe that the ice cap is never as extensive/thick as (Socialist/Communist/Fascist/Marxist) climate/arctic scientists estimate it is.
So you’re always going in one direction; away from whatever it is they have to say, while not committing to saying which direction things are going. If you said anything could happen, including shrinking, why are you always taking a contrarian view?
http://www.iup.uni-bremen.de:8084/amsr/arctic_AMSRE_nic.png