Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
Recent Comments
- arn on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- arn on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Gordon Vigurs on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Peter Carroll on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Robertvd on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Robertvd on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Gordon Vigurs on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Jack the Insider on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Bob G on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- conrad ziefle on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
There you go steve,
you are finding some really asinine ideas about global warming. Of course this is just a comment. there are nutcases on all sides,. but you previous posted link is just stupid. I am not surprised reuters did not mention who these scientists were predicting 6 meter rise in a generation. Trying to out-hansen hansen apparently.
“you are finding some really asinine ideas about global warming”
They aren’t hard to find Tony … there are lots of them.
Methane burp? I thought we needed a cobalt bomb, to “ignite” the atmosphere?
Yawn. Time to go to sleep.
That first sentence just needs a “watershed” mashed in there somewhere to be absolutely perfect.