Prior to last weekend, we never had more than 8,000 page views on a Saturday or Sunday.
(Rebecca Black gets about four hundred hits for every one here.)
Prior to last weekend, we never had more than 8,000 page views on a Saturday or Sunday.
(Rebecca Black gets about four hundred hits for every one here.)
Yeah, but back then the Internet was 30% less luminous, & combined with GIA, IWB should congratulate you for getting round about 1,000,000.00 hits/day.
Why do you keep saying “we” Steven?
A blog isn’t any value without its readers
Fair’s fair, AAiM, it’s surely legitimate for Steve to use the authorial plural when others, including thee, address him with the plural, “you”.
Use of the royal we is perfectly acceptable grammar.
Oui.
oui oui…….
wait….that just reminded me of Weiner
sorry if I gave anyone a visual!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxZjKspqwlE
AH HAA! Being a Liberal Progressive Democrat! WEE WEED UP!
When you talk of using a royal my thoughts are on Kate Middleton.
Who’s Rebbeca black?
She lets you know that Sunday comes after Saturday.
She’s a YouTube phenom:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbZqE1RdC4Y
Steve, at the risk of seeming overyly obsequious (I had to look up the spelling for that one) I look forward to seeing your posts on the same level as Steve Mc and Anthony. I rotate through every day because you have so much content and I like your commentary. I am on the front lines of the impact of GHG regulation, so this is very important to me.
Thanks, but I’m not much into theory. I prefer to stick with the gaping holes in logic behind this scam.
Should have looked up the spelling of “overly.”
I visit several times a day to watch the list of gaping holes grow. Just love it.
Thx!
ditto…
Ok, thank you Amino. I am now more up on what’s in and Rebecca owes Steve a “hit.”
What was the time of day? Isostatic and barometric adjustments applied?
Are those raw or adjusted page views?
Steven,
Just love your site and check it out multiple times a day – I have to – you just keep it coming!
Great job!
The historian aspect of me thoroughly enjoys the way you confront us, your readers, with the realities of past “climate change” and “extreme weather” events. Our eyes are opened and the complacent parts of our brains are constantly joggled. You are making a difference. Thanks.