Soot worse for global warming than thought
Soot particles may be twice as bad as the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide in contributing to global warming, suggests a new study.
Grains of soot deposited in snow have also caused about one-quarter of the observed rise in global surface temperature since 1880, suggests the model by James Hansen and Larissa Nazarenko. The pair examined how soot particles affect the atmosphere when they darken snow and ice.
Darkened snow traps more solar energy than pristine snow. The effect could explain why sea ice and glaciers are melting faster than expected from the increase in surface temperature alone, says Hansen of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York.
“The effect of soot on snow is unambiguous,” he told New Scientist. “It causes a strong warming effect.”
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- CO?²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on CO?²
- Ivan G Wainwright on CO?²
- arn on CO?²
- arn on CO?²
- Gordon Vigurs on CO?²
- Bob G on CO?²
- conrad ziefle on Back To The Future
- Francis Barnett on Back To The Future
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Crashex on Time Of Observation Bias
This was obviously a different Hames Hansen.
It was actually James Jansen ;^)
There certainly be more than one Hames Hansen.
¼ of the rise from soot, ½ from the sun, 1/3 (or so) from water vapor, 1/8 from the Earth’s interior. That only leaves about 9/10 for Carbon dioxide, right?
How does someone so clueless find his way to work each morning? Models? If so, he sure as Hell did not design them.
So the Chinese soot is exempt somehow? Because that is apparently causing cooling..
Dust and soot frequently change properties to do the most possible harm to minorities, women and children – and particularly teenage girls like Rebecca Black.