I am about to name my fourth rock of the summer “Don.” Satellite technology makes it very easy to find nameable rocks. In the 1970s, naming rocks was more of a challenge.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Joker And Midnight Toker
- Bob G on Cheering Crowds
- GW on Cheering Crowds
- Bob G on Cheering Crowds
- GW on Cheering Crowds
- Bob G on Joker And Midnight Toker
- Bob G on Cheering Crowds
- GW on Cheering Crowds
- Gordon Vigurs on Cheering Crowds
- Robertvd on Joker And Midnight Toker
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73a0h6h1IKQ
I am concerned about the apparent stereotyping.
All of these rocks are light-skinned rocks and have the same type of eyes.
What is the deeper meaning?
Gneiss, schist, gabbro, tuff.
They’re all rocks, and that’s enough.
“A rock by any other name would pell as neat”
They all look a bit stoned to me.
You not only need satellites to name rocks, you also need an agenda and the ability to imagine there is a rock when there is no rock.
I missed something… What is the naming rocks theme about?