Religion Of Peace Not Responsible For Norwegian Terror

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

52 Responses to Religion Of Peace Not Responsible For Norwegian Terror

  1. Tony Duncan says:

    Wow, most of rheas are in Iraq Afghanistan and Pakistan.
    Why would muslim terrorists attack THOSE PLACES?

    and you are profiling, just because he was Norwegian blonde and blue eyed and his name was Anders Behring Breivik does not mean he was not Al Qaida.

    • Grumpy Grampy ;) says:

      TonyD:
      There are different versions of the Religion of Peace. Peace is for those of the same version of belief. All others are considered open season. Realize that you are considered to be fair game also because it matters not your belief for some you are an infidel and it has been that way since the religion of peace was founded.

      • Tony Duncan says:

        Ah Jimash

        so you believe in cause and effect. Glad someone here is willing to acknowledge that a couple a trillion dollars blowing the crap out of mostly innocent people has lead to MORE terrorism since 9/11 than if we had just gone after Bin laden and caught him years ago without the whole Iraq disaster. “fight them over there, so they can target our soldiers that much easier”.

    • Blade says:

      “… Iraq Afghanistan and Pakistan.
      Why would muslim terrorists attack THOSE PLACES?

      You are a retard.

      • Tony Duncan says:

        Blade,

        again BRILLIANT rebuttal.
        Certainly if the United States was invaded by Muslims with overwhelming military superiority, Americans would peacefully accept the situation, and follow their preachers advice of trying to convert the enemy with love.

      • DEEBEE says:

        Duncey, your march hare comments desrve nothing better.

      • Tony Duncan says:

        Deebee,

        Agreed, who the heck do I think I am bringing facts into this discussion?

        and silly me, here I don’t actually believe it is right for anyone to blow up other people regardless of whether their country was invaded and friends and family were killed by someone of a different religion.

      • Jimash says:

        “and silly me, here I don’t actually believe it is right for anyone to blow up other people regardless of whether their country was invaded and friends and family were killed by someone of a different religion.”

        Cause, look behind you, meet effect.
        We call you a retard for your own good.

      • Blade says:

        First of, I apologize to anyone here offended by the R word, everyone except for Tony Duncan. I don’t know if he is or not, but calling him a retard is out of line because of the insult to those actual disadvantaged good souls, whom we all know in real life and have no ill will towards. Tony needs a new word, one captures the depth of his mental decadence. But right now, I got nothin’.

        “… Iraq Afghanistan and Pakistan.
        Why would muslim terrorists attack THOSE PLACES?

        “Certainly if the United States was invaded by Muslims with overwhelming military superiority, Americans would peacefully accept the situation”

        There is no way to unravel his twisted mind I’m afraid. I can simply point out the fact that he is tying himself in knots trying to state these two points …

        (1) Moslems only bomb and terrorize Moslems where they are invaded (by the USA of course and probably the Jews too). There was no terrorism or bombings in those places prior to 1991, 2001 and 2003 of course. Hussein didn’t terrorize anyone, nor did the Taliban. Whatever.

        (2) Establish moral equivalency between the USA invading and liberating Kuwait, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc; and Moslems invading the USA. He needs a CAT scan.

        Tony Duncan is a product of the USA school system, where it is ‘America is bad’ all the time, 24-7-365. Congratulations to him, he passed with flying colors. Now would someone please stick his ass on a plan to Tehran or Islamabad (no he doesn’t get to go to Baghdad or Kuwait City) so he can sort out the problems there on his own. Tell him to leave his passport at home though, I hear they treat illegal aliens much better than here in the horrific USA.

      • Tony Duncan says:

        Blade,

        I am not sure, but I think you got everyone of your assertions wrong of this wrong. Doing this on the fly because I have to run but let’s see.

        1. “(1) Moslems only bomb and terrorize Moslems where they are invaded (by the USA of course and probably the Jews too). There was no terrorism or bombings in those places prior to 1991, 2001 and 2003 of course. Hussein didn’t terrorize anyone, nor did the Taliban. Whatever.”
        Wrong I never said muslims ONLY bomb or terrorize where they are invaded by US. STEVE posted a list that has a MAJORITY of bombings/attacks that happened in those places recently. I pointed out to those that might not be aware that they are places the US has invaded or at least killed lost of people recently.

        #2. “(2) Establish moral equivalency between the USA invading and liberating Kuwait, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc; and Moslems invading the USA. He needs a CAT scan.”

        Wrong. i did not establish equivalency, I made a comparison. i do not and never stated that the situations are equivalent, they are not on most levels. I DID say that IF the US were invaded by people with a different religious beliefs than most americans, and lots of Americans were killed, including innocents, that I doubted the US population would follow Christian values and not resort to violence. the United States is not a dictatorship or anything like Iraq or Afghanistan.
        I never said that there was absolutely NO good out of removing both governments from power, or that The US should in any way be compared with those countries. Nothing I wrote is inconsistent with my belief that the people of Afghanistan, Iraq, and Kuwait are much better off (eventually anyway) with Saddam, and the taliban not being in power.

        Finally Blade says “Tony Duncan is a product of the USA school system, where it is ‘America is bad’ all the time, 24-7-365. Congratulations to him, he passed with flying colors. Now would someone please stick his ass on a plan to Tehran or Islamabad (no he doesn’t get to go to Baghdad or Kuwait City) so he can sort out the problems there on his own. Tell him to leave his passport at home though, I hear they treat illegal aliens much better than here in the horrific USA.”

        Yes. I am a product of the USA school System. During a time when there was no teaching of real history. Just that everything the US did was for the good of mankind. Yes, the indians were mentioned, and it was somewhat regrettable but worth it because of this great country we built. there was ABSOLUTELY NO Discussion of anything negative about the US,. EVER. I remember in high school finding out about American supported dictatorships that murdered and terrorized their populations, and about the US betrayal and terror in the Phillipines, bringing it up in History class and immediately being silenced by the teacher. I was told it was all lies, all the people killed were communists who were trying to destroy America. In spite of all the horrendous things the US and US backed countries have done over the Years (and continue to do under Obama) I consider the US to be a much better empire than most of the ones preceding it. i do not underplay the myriads of amazing wonderful and life affirming things that have been brought into the world and transformed our lives because of the uniqueness of my country. I NEVER have thought America was all bad all the time,and I have never written anything on this site to indicate that.

        So looking back I see i was correct. He DID get everything wrong. Both points he made about what I said are wrong, and his imaginary explanation of my views is wrong.

        Of course Blade will not actually read any of this. He will just filter it into whatever path doesn’t disturb his preconception and respond with something totally irrelevant.

  2. Bruce says:

    Oddly enough its starting to look like it wasn’t the usual suspects, even though one group of them claimed credit immediately.

    Translation of Bolt-speak: Bryant was a crazy who for no discernable reason shot and killed 35 people in Tasmania some years ago.

  3. Tony Duncan says:

    Grumpy,

    thanks for clearing that up. So all that time I spent in Egypt, Morocco, Kuwait, Senegal, Indonesia Malaysia and those 12 years in Yemeni and Palestinian occupied Brooklyn I just lucked out,

    And Rais Bhuiyan must not have been told that Strohman wasn’t Muslim. probably one of those leftist jewish lawyers told him the guy who shot him in the face was from his exact same version pf Islam
    (see my comment here)
    http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2011/07/23/200-named-storms-in-2011/
    the key quote from Strohman being “‘I was an uneducated idiot back then and now I’m a more understanding human being,”

    Too bad the guy who killed around 90 people was a Christian. if only Christianity had some prescription against violence… At least his Facebook page had one of his interests as “partying”

  4. Tony Duncan says:

    Steve,
    you are being ridiculous. those books are completely antithetical to Christianity. Charity, Loving your neighbor, turning the other cheek. You won’t find THOSE ideas in that reading list!

    • There is not a single Christian preacher alive or document which would have lent any support, encouragement or motivation to commit such an act. Not even Obama’s pastor. This is the work of a severely mentally ill individual acting alone. Try using your brain.

  5. P.J. says:

    From Reuters: “Breivik’s Facebook page appeared to have been blocked by late Friday. Earlier, it had listed interests including bodybuilding, conservative politics and freemasonry.”

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/23/us-norway-blast-idUSTRE76L2VI20110723

    Draw your own conclusions, but I will say this … he may have described himself as a Christian, but he certainly didn’t act as one. Any Christian worth their salt will condemn this horrific act wholeheartedly, just as I do.

  6. gator69 says:

    The only entity capable of deeming one a ‘Christian’ is Christ. If you do not follow His teachings you are not a Christian. Christ taught us to love one another, period.

  7. Dr. Killpatient says:

    Interesting how quickly Obama labeled this as “terrorism”…yet the Ft Hood shooting was an act of “twisted logic”. Surely, it could not have anything to do with Major Nidal Hasan screaming “Allahu Akbar!!!” as he gunned down 12 unarmed soldiers or anything.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *