Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Bob G on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- arn on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- william on Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- conrad ziefle on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- conrad ziefle on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- william on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- gordon vigurs on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Tel on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Bob G on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
During a dry period I would think that 51% capacity shows the dams are doing what they were designed to do.
I do believe their prognosticators were a bit off in their forecast.
Just for comparison, what is their current % of capacity?
Lake Powell is 73.76%
http://lakepowell.water-data.com/
Here is a link for Lake Powell water data.
It is interesting to me at least, how the levels at Lake Powell can change in a single year as much as they have this year – and it looks like there is still snow-melt that will continue to feed the Lake for awhile. At the link above snow pack is 562% of avg for July 13.
I asked the question on another thread, “how is Lake Powell a proxy for AGW?” and I guess my question was ill-posed. What I am asking is, are low-levels of Lake Powell a proxy for AGW and if they are, what exactly is the claimed mechanism for low water levels in Lake Powell as a function of AGW and if I understand correctly, it is claimed that AGW is caused by Mankind adding CO2 to the atmosphere.
So if there is a link between man-made CO2 and Lake Powell’s water level, I can check out the CO2 levels vs Lake Powell water levels over the next few years (or even 5 or 10 if I make it that long!) and see for myself if the prediction that man-made CO2 is making Lake Powell go dry.
Oh and thanks everybody…I am not a geologist, meteorologist, or climatologist but am really interested in this subject and have learned a lot about it and this website has helped my understanding.