Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Francis Barnett on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- Billyjack on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- conrad ziefle on “pushing nature past its limits”
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
During a dry period I would think that 51% capacity shows the dams are doing what they were designed to do.
I do believe their prognosticators were a bit off in their forecast.
Just for comparison, what is their current % of capacity?
Lake Powell is 73.76%
http://lakepowell.water-data.com/
Here is a link for Lake Powell water data.
It is interesting to me at least, how the levels at Lake Powell can change in a single year as much as they have this year – and it looks like there is still snow-melt that will continue to feed the Lake for awhile. At the link above snow pack is 562% of avg for July 13.
I asked the question on another thread, “how is Lake Powell a proxy for AGW?” and I guess my question was ill-posed. What I am asking is, are low-levels of Lake Powell a proxy for AGW and if they are, what exactly is the claimed mechanism for low water levels in Lake Powell as a function of AGW and if I understand correctly, it is claimed that AGW is caused by Mankind adding CO2 to the atmosphere.
So if there is a link between man-made CO2 and Lake Powell’s water level, I can check out the CO2 levels vs Lake Powell water levels over the next few years (or even 5 or 10 if I make it that long!) and see for myself if the prediction that man-made CO2 is making Lake Powell go dry.
Oh and thanks everybody…I am not a geologist, meteorologist, or climatologist but am really interested in this subject and have learned a lot about it and this website has helped my understanding.