ThinkProgress filed this report from Derry, New Hampshire.
It’s getting close to impossible to track Mitt Romney’s vacillating position on global warming. Appearing in Derry, New Hampshire, the Republican presidential candidate reversed last month’s stance on fighting greenhouse gases, telling a questioner that he didn’t think carbon emissions should be regulated as a pollutant
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Fifteen days to flatten the curve”
- Warm December 1923
- “Ensure No One Is Above the Law”
- The Best Electric Cars
- Honeybee Collapse Update
- “a live-animal market in Wuhan, China.”
- Fifteen Year Old Children In Australia Control The Weather
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
Recent Comments
- Tel on The Best Electric Cars
- Tel on The Best Electric Cars
- Tel on “Ensure No One Is Above the Law”
- Tony Heller on Warm December 1923
- Donna K on Warm December 1923
- arn on The Best Electric Cars
- Bill on The Best Electric Cars
- arn on “Ensure No One Is Above the Law”
- Gamecock on The Best Electric Cars
- Gamecock on “Ensure No One Is Above the Law”
I believe in redemption. Go Mitt, go. Any republican out there is better than our current ‘situation’.
The election will not be decided upon this issue. Given the financial mess we are in, I do not think it will even be a major factor if any republican wins. That being said, I would support Mitt if he was nominated, but I will not support him for the nomination.
I hear that………
He ain’t the answer. He’ll buckle under greenie group temper tantrums, like the current President.
In fact Mr Obama will do anything to avoid greenie group temper tantrums. Not that I care very much for this behavior myself, but that’s not the way to deal with the problem.
You know what…you are right and IMHO it’s just nuts how these politicians play these games. For gosh sakes, if a reasonably conservative candidate would just come out and say “stuff it greenies – you don’t get the science you don’t get the policy options – every negative about global warming has been vastly exaggerated and the fixes you recommend will destroy the economy.”
No one – not even Michelle Bachman is talking like this but if someone stood up and pointed out how the green agenda is destroying the economy based on nothing more than a weak conjecture dressed up as “settled science” than I predict that every conservative conservative and most “independents” would get behind that message.
I used to think these greenie religious zealots would divide and conquer themselves – like the Communists did (“You aren’t a REAL Communist! You’re a FAKE communist! You don’t know what Communism is!”) – and they would shoot each other or have them sent off to the Gulag, depending on their position in the Communist Party.
The process isn’t happening quickly enough
Funny, I currently believe in “fighting greenhouse gases” and simultaneous don’t think that “carbon emissions should be regulated as a pollutant”. There is no constant reversal going on here…you can approach #1 without requiring #2.
-Scott
@Scott: “you can approach #1 without requiring #2”.
Absolutely. Not enough greenies get that, though. There are many ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions without driving the economy over a cliff. Here is one way …
http://theresilientearth.com/?q=content/americas-atomic-folly