I got a kick out of this comment on Andy Revkin’s blog, which cites Hansen’s writings as proof of Hansen’s writings.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
Recent Comments
- czechlist on Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- Bob G on Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Peter Carroll on Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Hank Phillips on Seventeen Years Of Fun
- Hank Phillips on Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Scott Allen on Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- conrad ziefle on Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Gordon Vigurs on Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Bob G on Did Bill Gates Do This?
- conrad ziefle on Did Bill Gates Do This?
Turtles, all the way down…
This reminds me of the leftists love of padding each others’ resumes with sparkly shiny awards. Then when their authority rightly is questioned, they point to those same awards for groupthink, and crow. It is circular, incestuous, leftist self gratification and adulation.
Gosh then that mean there was climate change back in the 1930’s after all.
With the decade of the 1930’s still to this day the hottest on record.
This reminds me of a certain individual who cited the authority of the IPCC in support of his AGW claim while neglecting to mention that he was the lead author of that section of the IPCC report… In effect, he was citing the authority of himself.