Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- arn on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- Bob G on CO2²
- Bob G on CO2²
- conrad ziefle on CO2²
- arn on CO2²
Rapid re-freeze in the Arctic skyrocketing:
http://arctic-roos.org/observations/satellite-data/sea-ice/observation_images/ssmi1_ice_ext.png
If we want to drown all the Poley Bears, we are going to have to try harder.
With all this cold weather, I’ll take more time to warm up my fossil fueled car.
That should help.
After the article was written (1954), we cooled significantly for the next 25 years, culminating in 3 straight brutally severe winters from 1977 to 1979. Shows they had no predictive ability back then, with no evidence of any better predictive abilities now.
Sad isn’t it, when you consider the amount of taxpayers money thrown at it.
And everyone died, or not.
Is there a hypothetical method by which the pole refreezes after melting?