Google Buries Libya Story

A smoking gun has been found showing that Obama was lying about Libya, so Google buries this huge story, and instead tries to smear Romney with a story about some whacko Republican in Indiana.

Google News

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

63 Responses to Google Buries Libya Story

  1. jmburd says:

    Look on every major ‘news’ website right now and they’re doing the same thing. The state senator’s stupid remarks on pg 1. Libya coverup? Nowhere to be found. CNN? NBC? BBC? NPR? Want to know why I think your news is slanted? There you go.

  2. I switched from Google to Bing as my preferred search engine a long time ago. And Bing is just as good as Google these days.

  3. Off topic:

    On the El Nino that got lost…

    “The chief climate forecaster says it is the biggest turnaround in weather patterns since records began… Come September, all of a sudden, the temperature started to cool down, the trade winds started to become a little bit enhanced, and the cloud patterns and other indicators like that headed away from El Nino,” he said.”

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-10-24/forecasters-surprised-by-el-nino-turnaround/4332260

    Interesting times…

  4. mikegeo says:

    Here’s a very good take on the Libya/Benghazi story today by Delingpole. He’s absolutely right – the MSM are being moved away from the truth by the Whitehouse spin doctors who see Obama losing this.
    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100186461/benghazi-will-do-to-obama-what-al-qaeda-did-to-chris-stevens/

  5. Edward. says:

    F*** Google.

  6. RoHa says:

    ” some whacko Republican in Indiana.”

    Is there any other kind of Republican?

    From an Australian point of view, the Democrats are a bunch of ignorant, stupid, lying, corrupt, scarily right-wing, loonies. The Republicans are a bunch of ignorant, stupid, lying, corrupt, terrifyingly right-wing, foam-flecked total whackos.

    Our Australian politicians are, of course, sensible, intelligent, well informed, honest, moderate statesmen/women whose only concern is the well-being of the Australian people.

    You ask anyone here. They’ll tell you.

    • omnologos says:

      Is it wrong to wonder if Ambassador Stevens were gay? As that might have played a part in the brutality and determination of the aggression. And no I’m not saying it’d have been ‘his fault’. Just an additional security lapse.

  7. Andy DC says:

    It is hard to get good news analysis from anyone these days, as there are few if any objective reporters. They have all taken sides. That is a shame.

  8. physicist says:

    Mourdock is not a lone wolf Repuglican wacko, 5 Repuglican wacko candidates for the Senate in 2010 said the same thing, and 7 Repuglican candidates are saying the same thing this cycle.

    Romney cut a TV ad for Mourdock, let it go on the air, and continues to support him. You are known by the company you keep.

    Repuglican science and Repuglican morality are oxymorons.

    • Obama lied about the death of the Libyan ambassador,and only a complete scumbag would try to cover this fact up.

      • gator69 says:

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4c-W-JC0bo

        Yep! Round all those lunatics up, starting with Biden, who claims to be Catholic. And guess who is second in line if Obummer kicks it?

        Anyone heard how Obummer’s nephew is doing after his surgery? 😉

      • physicist says:

        Bush lied, Cheney lied, Rumsfeld lied, Rice lied, Wolfowitz lied, Powell lied, they all lied about WMD, and over 4000 of our kids died, over 1,000,000 Iraqi died, and it has/will cost us $3TRILLION or more. Where were you then? Don’t be a f’ing hypocrite.

        And that bunch of scumbags stills walks the face of this earth. Though Powell has admitted lying, because he was told lies, and at least he’s doing some redemption now supports Obama.

        • Then don’t vote for Bush, you moron.

        • philjourdan says:

          I have made this challenge to every liberal who has claimed Bush lied. Prove it.

          Opinions do not count, and that is all you are giving. The truth is Bush did not lie (nor any of the others). That they were wrong is a given. But for the slow learners, to prove he lied, you have to prove he KNEW there were no WMDs. So do not give your opinion as proof. Prove he KNEW.

      • physicist says:

        Correct, I won’t vote for Bush III (Romney) – 17 of Romney’s 24 foreign policy advisors are Bush II warmongering neocons. You will get what you pay for, and when you buy neocons, you get unnecessary wars.

        And you will get more tax cuts for the rich, more failed triclke-down economics

        • Apparently you plan to vote for the Chicago scumbag in chief. What does that say about you?

        • philjourdan says:

          The statement was not to vote for Bush. You lied and said Romney was Bush III. He may be many things, but he is not related to Bush, nor is he the adopted son. If you do not want to vote for Romney, SAY you will not vote for Romney. Stop lying about what you are doing.

      • gator69 says:

        Please provide proof that your accusations of lies have any validity whatsoever. I could claim you are a physicist, nut without documentation, you are still a dog catcher, as far as we all know.

        Have you heard anything about Obummer’s nephew?

  9. philjourdan says:

    Bing first, google second.

  10. physicist says:

    Repuglican Science – The earth is 6000 years old (or is it 8000)

    Repuglican Science – Humans and dinosaurs lived at the same time on the 6000 year old earth (see the creationist theme park in KY)

    Repuglcian science – Evolution is a myth

    Repuglcian science – Women can’t get pregnant from ‘legitimate rape.’ The female body shuts it down. pregnancy from rape is the same as out of wedlock pregnancy,

    Repuglcian science – Global Warming is a myth

    Repuglican science – Science text books are gossip and innuendo, science only comes from the bible. somewhere in the bible there must be something about laws of motion, electromagnetic theory, and computers.

    • Brian G Valentine says:

      You’re a turkey

    • philjourdan says:

      Democrat science (see I do not have to use juvenile ad hominems to describe someone): Gaia is god. Why? Because we BELIEVE it. What proof? No proof is needed, only belief.

      • physicist says:

        You are using juvenile ad hominems. It is the Democratic Party not the ‘Democrat’ Party.

        • Obama is a Democrap.

        • philjourdan says:

          Sorry, no ad hominems today. I merely pointed out the Democrat party Sociopathy. You then spew the ad hominems. What did I state that was insulting? Nothing. Just that their religion is not science. Guess what? Religion is not science. Only difference is the Democrat party does not know the difference.

          That is not an ad hominem. (go to webstersdictionary dot com to learn the meaning). That is a simple statement of fact. If you are a democrat, let the shoe fit. I did not call you a democrat (now that would have been an ad hominem).

          Let me guess, Physicist is the biggest word you can spell?

  11. physicist says:

    Repuglicans are so sick that VP no longer stands for Vice President – It stands for Vaginal Probe.

    • Obama is a sociopath, and you are voting for him.

      • physicist says:

        I’ll add that to my Repuglican psychological science definitions – anyone you don’t like is a sociopath, by your definition.

        sort of like global warming is a myth, by your definition.

      • gator69 says:

        Sociopath Qualities:

        Contemptuous of those who seek to understand them
        Does not perceive that anything is wrong with them
        Authoritarian
        Secretive
        Paranoid
        Only rarely in difficulty with the law, but seeks out situations where their tyrannical behavior will be tolerated, condoned, or admired
        Conventional appearance
        Goal of enslavement of their victim(s)
        Exercises despotic control over every aspect of the victim’s life
        Has an emotional need to justify their crimes and therefore needs their victim’s affirmation (respect, gratitude and love)
        Ultimate goal is the creation of a willing victim
        Incapable of real human attachment to another
        Unable to feel remorse or guilt
        Extreme narcissism and grandiose
        May state readily that their goal is to rule the world

        Hey Physi-dog-catcher! How’s Obama’s nephew’s recovery coming along? Hmmmmm?

    • Brian G Valentine says:

      You haven’t been reading manuals on how to build pipe bombs, etc and think you can “fix this” like Unabomber did, have you?

  12. gator69 says:

    One of my most leftist coworkers was fired the other day, and right before he left we had a brief conversation regarding voter fraud. He alleged that the vast majority of voter fraud is perpetrated by republicans, yet he said that voter fraud is not an issue that democrats need to address. He did not see the cognitive dissonance in his statement, did not find it odd that the “cheater” republicans would challenge voter fraud, and looked at me sideways when I asked if he had any principles. More proof that the brain atrophies without logic.

    The brainwashing is complete, the sheep are bleating in tune with Soros.

    • physicist says:

      Did you ever hear of the Attorneys General scandal in the Bush administration?

      • You are desperate to change the subject away from Obama. Perhaps you didn’t get the memo that this is 2012.

      • physicist says:

        Don’t worry, you’ll be OK, but I know it hard on you right now.

        You’ve just got a bad case of Obamaphobia on top of your global warmanoia.

        Tough to deal with.

      • physicist says:

        welllll, exxxcuuuse me. this thread, as with all of them on this site, look like utter bullshit to me. i though i was just fitting in. i though that was what this blog focused on – how much utter bullshit can a bullshitter uttered?

        you want me to believe what you say about Obama? after you lie with impunity about global warming and repeatedly make ad hominen attacks against climate scientists?

        • I can’t help it if you are an idiot.

        • philjourdan says:

          You really should stop talking to yourself. As for the content of this thread and site, if you are incapable of understanding the English language, I can well understand your frustration with reading it. If you are ESL, google has an excellent translate feature. If you are illiterate, then I would suggest education.

      • Brian G Valentine says:

        Earn respect, physicist.

        Here is cute problem (I saw this on a web site, could have earned $300 as prize, somebody beat me to it)

        Without use of calculator at all, prove

        1/2 * 3/4* 5/6 * … * 99/100 < 0.08

        If you can do it, I won't call you just another loudmouth on the internet

    • gator69 says:

      Please read comments before “replying”.

      “On July 21, 2010, Nora Dannehy, the special prosecutor tasked with investigating the attorney dismissals, concluded that “there was insufficient evidence to establish that persons knowingly made material false statements to [the Office of Inspector General] or Congress or corruptly endeavored to obstruct justice” and that no criminal charges would be filed against Sampson or Gonzales.”

      So what?

      How is your nephew?

  13. physicist says:

    Let’s see now, Colin Powell endorses Obama,

    Romney is endorsed by Glen Beckistan, and Donald the Birther.

    What a difficult choice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *