“the basic physics of climate change is irrefutable”.
Ed Davey, Secretary of State for Energy & Climate Change
If the physics are so simple, why are temperatures below Hansen’s zero emissions Scenario C?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- John Francis on Mission Accomplished
- Mike on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Timo, not that one! on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Bill on Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Gamecock on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Gamecock on “pushing nature past its limits”
- William on Mission Accomplished
- Gordon Vigurs on Mission Accomplished
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- Bob G on Mission Accomplished
Raypierre tried the same flawed arguments with me on the NYT comment sections once.
I replied that basic physics tells us warm air rises above cold air. This would make them predict the top of Mount Everest to be among the warmest places on Earth.
Ps Aristotle with their same reasoning thoughts Earth surrounded by a sphere of fire..
Because they have got something wrong and are fighting to not have to admit it.
Emissions are negative? Immissions?
If it’s basic physics why do they have to create all of the speculative Rube Goldberg schemes of positive feedbacks and tipping points?
basic physics + incomplete understanding = failed predictions/projections