“the basic physics of climate change is irrefutable”.
Ed Davey, Secretary of State for Energy & Climate Change
If the physics are so simple, why are temperatures below Hansen’s zero emissions Scenario C?
“the basic physics of climate change is irrefutable”.
Ed Davey, Secretary of State for Energy & Climate Change
If the physics are so simple, why are temperatures below Hansen’s zero emissions Scenario C?
Raypierre tried the same flawed arguments with me on the NYT comment sections once.
I replied that basic physics tells us warm air rises above cold air. This would make them predict the top of Mount Everest to be among the warmest places on Earth.
Ps Aristotle with their same reasoning thoughts Earth surrounded by a sphere of fire..
Because they have got something wrong and are fighting to not have to admit it.
Emissions are negative? Immissions?
If it’s basic physics why do they have to create all of the speculative Rube Goldberg schemes of positive feedbacks and tipping points?
basic physics + incomplete understanding = failed predictions/projections