Twenty years ago on this date, Antarctic sea ice occupied 1.3 million km^2. Today it has increased by almost 100% to 2.4 million km^2.
arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/timeseries.south.anom.1979-2008
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- John Francis on Mission Accomplished
- Mike on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Timo, not that one! on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Bill on Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Gamecock on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Gamecock on “pushing nature past its limits”
- William on Mission Accomplished
- Gordon Vigurs on Mission Accomplished
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- Bob G on Mission Accomplished
There must be a politically correct explanation for this….
let’s see…
this new ice is high carbon ice
it is also called rotten ice
it forms at an adjusted higher temperature
it only melts at temperatures below freezing
the true real pure ice is gone forever
comparing old ice with new ice is comparing apples and oranges
politically rotten apples and politically rotten oranges
More clear proof of global warming
Personally, I’d like to throw in a few rotten tomatoes,
hitting the politically correct targets, of course.
We know the names.
It’s called cold!
http://www.wunderground.com/global/stations/89828.html
Things that make you go hmmm…
Like so many other things, this is not consistent with global warming theory. Bookmark this post to use in your arguments. Use both links in making your case (also the uiuc raw data link).
Thick ice in the Antarctic is rotten de-ozonated ice
Thin ice in the Arctic is rotten sooted ice
Thick ice in the Arctic is … lalalalalala… not listening!
Anyone hear anything about Australian whales retreating to Antarctica because of “Global Warming”? Just ran across a ref to that and it was a new one on me.