Why Doesn’t Obama Go After The Illegal Guns?

Obama’s home town of Chicago is far more dangerous than Afghanistan, because of the illegal guns being used by minority gangs.

Obama ignores the illegal guns, and is instead going after the legally held guns owned by law-abiding citizens – in regions where the violent crime rate is essentially zero.

What are his motivations for doing his?

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Why Doesn’t Obama Go After The Illegal Guns?

  1. Bob Honiker says:

    When your entire agenda depends on exploiting crisis situations you never want to actually solve a crisis.

    • squid2112 says:

      You are exactly right Bob! .. The goal here is to create more crisis’, not solve a crisis. Remember, “never let a good crisis go to waste”, and “if you don’t have a crisis, create one”

  2. Sundance says:

    The criminal element is intertwined with the political machine, that’s the honest answer. Rahm Emanuell has mobilized 200 desk officers into the cold and snow as a show which will impress dingbat progressives already living in safe North Shore gated communities, but will have no impact on murders. I expect a major outbreak of Blue Flu in Chicago any day. 🙂

  3. kbray in california says:

    Security guards and metal detectors at entrances to public housing to inhibit illegal weapons would be money well spent. Focus on where the problem is.

    A minor price to pay by the residents for getting essentially almost free housing.

  4. Eric Barnes says:

    Because he doesn’t give a $hit about the average bear.

  5. “What are his motivations for doing his?”

    Professional courtesy.

  6. Ben says:

    Because those with illegal weapons don’t use them as a deterrent. They use them to violate the rights of others. They aren’t afraid to shoot cops, much less glorified gun-fetchers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *