Congress has held dozens of hearings on “climate change.”
there were the [NASA scientist Jim] Hansen hearings [in 1988].
And did you also alter the temperature in the hearing room that day?
… What we did it was went in the night before and opened all the windows, I will admit, right? So that the air conditioning wasn’t working inside the room and so when the, when the hearing occurred there was not only bliss, which is television cameras in double figures, but it was really hot. … So Hansen’s giving this testimony, you’ve got these television cameras back there heating up the room, and the air conditioning in the room didn’t appear to work. So it was sort of a perfect collection of events that happened that day, with the wonderful Jim Hansen, who was wiping his brow at the witness table and giving this remarkable testimony.
Obama constantly presents the message that anyone who disagrees with him is evil and stupid. Dear Leader of the west.
If Obama’s lips are moving or his fingers are tweeting, he is lying. His goal appears to be to destroy the United States of America.
h/t to Tom Nelson
Democrats today expressed fury and frustration with the GOP which for the 25th time in a row has refused them hearings in the appropriations committee where Democrats are seeking funding for the establishment of a federal authority of witch seeking.
“Republicans are idling standing by and endangering the future of our children while witches make away with toddlers to cook them for stew and curse our cattle. It is time to stop denying the existence of witchcraft and act!
“Impeach you, Mr. President”
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.
Lovely how the administration calls their political adversaries “deniers.” If there was an equivelent term that Pubs through around for their opponents the press would have an absolute fit.
Whenever consensus climate scientists debate climate sceptics they get the proverbial kicked out of them. They lose, always, because their science has so many holes you could drive a herd of polar bears through it. Now the climate scientists refuse to debate because they always look so bad when doing so it undermines their
spin, sorry,message.So, perhaps the GOP can allow the debate with conditions. The condition is that at least three live 1 hr TV debates are held on PBS between climate scientists and policy leaders chosen by each side, with a neutral moderator (name to be agreed unanimously by a committee of 3 Dems and 3 Reps) .
Then they can have the House debate. With expert witnesses.