Which is why the ice has continued to thicken at the same rate it was prior to March 15.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Terry Shipman on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Earlier Than Usual”
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gamecock on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gamecock on “Earlier Than Usual”
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.
Ice not thick enough for polar bear ice skating. They are doomed!
And the ice will continue to thicken until May/June. Archives bear that out. No pun intended Andy. LOL
Does anybody know if the ice in the Baltic is included in the totals for the Arctic?
Yes omnologos,i wonder if they have??Certain ones are complaining about it
http://iceagenow.info/2013/04/ice-breakers-astounded-record-spread-ice-baltic-sea/
Steve,
The link you posted says very clearly that the data is provisional. Making sweeping pronouncements on provisional data is a bit like asking the bookie to pay you out before the game is finished.
You are an idiot.