What do they say about the tip of the iceberg?
A jury in South Bend, Indiana has found that fraud put President Obama and Hillary Clinton on the presidential primary ballot in Indiana in the 2008 election. Two Democratic political operatives were convicted Thursday night in the illegal scheme after only three hours of deliberations. They were found guilty on all counts.
Former longtime St. Joseph County Democratic party Chairman Butch Morgan Jr. was found guilty of felony conspiracy counts to commit petition fraud and forgery, and former county Board of Elections worker Dustin Blythe was found guilty of felony forgery counts and falsely making a petition, after being accused of faking petitions that enabled Obama, then an Illinois Senator, to get on the presidential primary ballot for his first run for the White House.
Nees previously told Fox News that the fraud was clearly evident, “because page after page of signatures are all in the same handwriting,” and that nobody raised any red flags “because election workers in charge of verifying their validity were the same people faking the signatures.
Officials found guilty in Obama, Clinton ballot petition fraud | Fox News
h/t to gofer
A third-world coup, in America. Too many people–Republicans as well as Democrats–were then, and are now, too sanguine that the system is working, and too intent upon continuing to “get theirs” (hardly even bothering to remind themselves, “while the getting is good”). Never mind all the people who went broke in the recession, and whom are no longer even counted as “unemployed”; the rallying cry, presented in cynically helpful commercials, is, “let them eat reverse mortgages! (IF they have sufficient equity, of course–we’re not a charity, you know)”. (And no, I don’t have a reverse mortgage, that is just one example of how the pain of the “recession” has been turned into lemonade by the money-changers, who have ever been the ones to “never let a good crisis go to waste”.) The point is, this criminal administration had long-term causes, due to incompetent dogmas and the corruption of power on both sides; and behind it all, a public all too willing to tell itself, “just let me have mine, and you can do what you want.”
Now, tell me again—we really don’t need voter ID laws or better election oversight…?
Also, IF Obama were not able to get IN electoral votes in 2008, would he have won the election? Probably, but still…
Background checks for voters! No background checks for gun purchasers! Ah, Republicans…
You have no idea what you are talking about.
RE: Moku – “Background checks for voters! No background checks for gun purchasers!”
Rampant idiocy from Moku! Facts from Steven!
Tell me again why it is that democrats claim voter fraud is not an issue, I seem to have forgotten again.
Practically everytime I’ve walked into a polling place it’s being run lock stock and barrel by the far left League of Women Voters.The leftist have obviously figured out that they can control the whole election process from top to bottom.
Man you’ve got that tinfoil hat on extra tight! Did Alex Jones tighten it for you?
Moku,
Still no facts in your brainless assertion, I see.
Carry on.
Like the same experts that verified Obama’s birth certificate were the same people who create it?
I think it was Stalin who said that it does not matter how people vote; what matters is who counts the votes. Saint Obama and his useful idiots have learned this well.
Any bets on whether Saint Obama has a third term? He don need no stinkin laws or Constitution; he makes his own laws; he does whatever he wants to,
How much would you like to bet he doesn’t run for a third term? I will bet you everything I own. Because I, unlike you, am not a moron.
“Because I, unlike you, am not a moron.”
Yet, obviously you are comfortable with hate speech and internet bullying.
Regardless, please do educate us. Defend your above false claim that a background check isn’t required in the US to buy a firearm (or even simply certain parts of firearms such as lower receivers). Or were you just referring to the back alleys of Chicago and/or the Obama Administration’s Fast & Furious program?
If that proves too difficult Einstein, then simply tell us which you believe to be worse – a moron (utilizing your terminology), defined as someone that doesn’t possess the mental capability to distinguish between right or wrong…or an intelligent liar that does?
I would be very surprised if Obama gave up the office, especially if it appeared that a conservative candidate would replace him. We are watching a coup in the making.
I gave up hope when it was clear they had gotten to John Roberts. The Chief Justice was about to scuttle Obamacare and… he was flipped! How? Blackmail, almost certainly. Something in Roberts’ past. Same with General Petraeus.
They have learned to game the election system. In numerous areas Obama got 100.0% of the vote. Romney did not get ONE VOTE out of tens of thousands! Now, I know that blacks voted 91% for Obama. But not 100%. Out of tens of thousands of votes, Romney didn’t get ONE??
And in numerous locations electronic voting machines kept showing the vote going to Obama, when the voter had hit the ‘Romney’ button on the screen. Repeatedly. And there was the election machine programmer who testified that he had rigged machines in Obama’s favor:
http://www.americanthinker.com/video/2012/11/programmer_testifies_about_rigging_elections_with_vote_counting.html
If Romney had Obama’s support of the media, he would have won by twenty points. The fact that Obama barely squesked by means that Democrat cheating made the difference.
I’d join the chorus of “Wake up, Americans!”
But it is too late.
This was a Democratic primary that Clinton won. The headline “Obama Election Was Fraudulent” shows either a total lack of understanding of the election system by the author, or a total lack of ethics in trying mislead readers. Either way Steve Goddard should be ashamed. But you keep it up Steve, moderate citizens with a IQ of more than 80 can only be turned off by this kind BS.
You are an idiot.
you need an IQ over 80 to read…………..”was found guilty”???
Do you really think this was an isolated incident? There were other primary events where things had help to get a win for Obama. Another example was Texas. The bottom line is Americans are not able to trust the process. Precincts where Obama received 100% of the votes is another example.
When Obama received 90% of the vote of blacks overall, it is entirely possible that in some small highly black precincts he received 100% of the vote.
http://www.redstate.com/2012/11/13/is-it-time-to-roll-up-the-welcome-mat-here/
That is idiotically stupid and racist. Unanimity in 100,000 votes is a statistical impossibility due to the fact that a certain percentage of the voters make errors on the ballots.
Re: “Unanimity in 100,000 votes..”
In the 2012 presidential election 129 million people cast votes, and there were more than 100,000 polling places. So the average polling place had 1,290 votes, and that was the average, some were considerably smaller than that. So, when there were 750 or 900 votes in a highly black district, the chance of 100% of them going for Obama when the overall average vote for Obama among blacks was 90% is a reasonable probability.
Re racist. If you are saying that for me to say that 90% of blacks voted for Obama, when that is what the exit polls said is “racist,” then I say that you are nutty. That is a fact, as is the fact that many voting districts are considerably lower than the average, which was about 1,290 votes cast per district.
You don’t see a problem with this?
“not one contrarian voter in those 59 divisions, where unofficial vote tallies have President Obama outscoring Romney by a combined 19,605 to 0”
http://mobile.philly.com/news/?wss=/philly/news/politics/&id=178742021&viewAll=y
80% of the counties in the US voted for Romney in 2012.
What is wrong with you?
Re 59 divisions. So, there were 19,605 votes in 59 districts. So the average district size was about 330 persons, small districts. And they were mainly in black areas, and Obama was highly popular and got 90% of the vote of blacks overall. That means that many districts he had to get more than 90%, and the fact that he got 100% in 59 districts—when there are about 100,000 districts in the total election—is not impossible. What you apparently do not know is that Romney may have gotten 100% in some small districts too.
I wonder, if an entire all-white district had voted 100% for Romney, would the left simply call that a ‘fact’ or ‘statistic”? Hmmmmm…
Most likely there WERE some small districts that went 100% for Romney.
Once again your zealotry has blinded you to all other information. You are a nut, unless you are getting paid, then you are an employed nut.
Small districts in Philadelphia? ROFLMAO
100% vote is not possible for 19,000 votes. I hope you are getting paid well to spread bullshit.
Re: “100% vote is not possible for 19,000 votes. I hope you are getting paid well to spread bullshit.”
I’m not paid, and if several million black voters voted 90% for Obama, then the chance that 19,000 of them voted 100% for Obama IS possible, and not by any means surprising.