5,000 lives believed to have been lost due to bitter March | Metro News
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
Recent Comments
- Francis Barnett on Back To The Future
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Crashex on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Mike on Climate Scamming For Profit
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Francis Barnett on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Bob G on Time Of Observation Bias
- arn on Climate Scamming For Profit
Headline should read – CARBON TAX KILLS 5000 IN UK!
Here in Australia, pensioners are starving or eating dogfood because their power bills are so high because of the stupid carbon tax. No-one knows how many have died due to their standard of living plummeting. And the ALP , who introduced it, say they are the party for the workers and disadvantaged!!! Absolute crap. They’re a bunch of union hacks and blood sucking lawyers.
I assume this was front page news on the Guardian.
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.
Environuts and heartless green politicians see these deaths as a good thing, less money being spent by government on the elderly means more money for environmental crack pots and new age science. More debauchery for ExcelPhil and Slingherhook.
The Bias Broadcasting Comrades (aka BBC) has a most interesting propaganda post on their Newspeak website –
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/climateexperiment/whattheymean/theuk.shtml
Apparently it is supposed to be a teaching aid…
„The Met Office is calling a meeting of top scientists to look at the “urgent” question of whether the warming of the Arctic is affecting UK weather.” http://www.itv.com/news/update/2013-04-10/met-offices-urgent-inquiry-into-arctic-effect-on-uk-weather/
If MetOff what to talk about the cold March and April 2013, a look at NS & Baltic SST, far below average :
___e.g. 31. March http://www.ocean-climate-law.com/13/Arch/_b/9_9_15b.jpg
___e.g. 11. April http://climate-ocean.com/2013/b/9_4_2b.jpg
___ today (direct link) : http://ocean.dmi.dk/satellite/index.uk.php
may explain a lot to Met Office, and may even force them to consider human input, as the cold from Siberia, which Stefan Rahmstorf (28/29 March 2013) assumes, is not well founded, discussed here: http://www.ocean-climate-law.com/13/Arch/9_9.html ;
And the ITV/UK report here: http://climate-ocean.com/2013/9_4.html
Did it help them before?
Err is it they are not employing the TOP scientist? if not why are they “the MET” considered experts over there?
ITV wrote: “ Scientists want to investigate whether there is a link between these temperatures and the lowest ever Arctic ice levels, which were recorded a few months ago.”
For sure MetOff knows where the Arctic is, but nothing is said whether they have ever heard from the North Sea.
11. Apr. 2013 SST anomalies : http://climate-ocean.com/2013/b/9_4_3b_.jpg