5,000 lives believed to have been lost due to bitter March | Metro News
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Terry Shipman on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Earlier Than Usual”
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gamecock on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gamecock on “Earlier Than Usual”
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
Headline should read – CARBON TAX KILLS 5000 IN UK!
Here in Australia, pensioners are starving or eating dogfood because their power bills are so high because of the stupid carbon tax. No-one knows how many have died due to their standard of living plummeting. And the ALP , who introduced it, say they are the party for the workers and disadvantaged!!! Absolute crap. They’re a bunch of union hacks and blood sucking lawyers.
I assume this was front page news on the Guardian.
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.
Environuts and heartless green politicians see these deaths as a good thing, less money being spent by government on the elderly means more money for environmental crack pots and new age science. More debauchery for ExcelPhil and Slingherhook.
The Bias Broadcasting Comrades (aka BBC) has a most interesting propaganda post on their Newspeak website –
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/climateexperiment/whattheymean/theuk.shtml
Apparently it is supposed to be a teaching aid…
„The Met Office is calling a meeting of top scientists to look at the “urgent” question of whether the warming of the Arctic is affecting UK weather.” http://www.itv.com/news/update/2013-04-10/met-offices-urgent-inquiry-into-arctic-effect-on-uk-weather/
If MetOff what to talk about the cold March and April 2013, a look at NS & Baltic SST, far below average :
___e.g. 31. March http://www.ocean-climate-law.com/13/Arch/_b/9_9_15b.jpg
___e.g. 11. April http://climate-ocean.com/2013/b/9_4_2b.jpg
___ today (direct link) : http://ocean.dmi.dk/satellite/index.uk.php
may explain a lot to Met Office, and may even force them to consider human input, as the cold from Siberia, which Stefan Rahmstorf (28/29 March 2013) assumes, is not well founded, discussed here: http://www.ocean-climate-law.com/13/Arch/9_9.html ;
And the ITV/UK report here: http://climate-ocean.com/2013/9_4.html
Did it help them before?
Err is it they are not employing the TOP scientist? if not why are they “the MET” considered experts over there?
ITV wrote: “ Scientists want to investigate whether there is a link between these temperatures and the lowest ever Arctic ice levels, which were recorded a few months ago.”
For sure MetOff knows where the Arctic is, but nothing is said whether they have ever heard from the North Sea.
11. Apr. 2013 SST anomalies : http://climate-ocean.com/2013/b/9_4_3b_.jpg