5,000 lives believed to have been lost due to bitter March | Metro News
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Imaginary Cold And Snow
- Six Years Of No Conversation
- THE YEAR OF NO WINTER
- Climate Misinformation From AI (Part II)
- Grok’s “Anecdotal” Data
- Earth Granted 26 Year Reprieve
- Ancient Astronauts
- Hillary To Win By Double Digits
- Global Communism To Save The Maldives
- Another Top New York Judge
- The Saudi Arabia Of Wind
- Defending The Faith
- 90% Certainty – Four Meters Of Sea Level Rise By 2030
- NOAA Climate Fraud Index
- 98 Degrees Too Hot For Phoenix Residents
- Global Warming Threatens The Children
- Defective Memories
- The Last Refuge
- Consensus Science From 1974
- Kennedy’s Big Oil Infatuation
- “Truman Says CIA Was Diverted From Its Original Assignment”
- 1939 Warmth And Drought
- Never Mind About Sea Level …
- Another Climate Migration
- April 14, 1886 Tornado Outbreak
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Six Years Of No Conversation
- Bob G on Imaginary Cold And Snow
- arn on Six Years Of No Conversation
- conrad ziefle on Six Years Of No Conversation
- conrad ziefle on Grok’s “Anecdotal” Data
- Ulric Lyons on The Siberian/Mediterranean UK Climate
- arn on Hillary To Win By Double Digits
- Richard E Fritz on Hillary To Win By Double Digits
- arn on Climate Misinformation From AI (Part II)
- William on Grok’s “Anecdotal” Data
Headline should read – CARBON TAX KILLS 5000 IN UK!
Here in Australia, pensioners are starving or eating dogfood because their power bills are so high because of the stupid carbon tax. No-one knows how many have died due to their standard of living plummeting. And the ALP , who introduced it, say they are the party for the workers and disadvantaged!!! Absolute crap. They’re a bunch of union hacks and blood sucking lawyers.
I assume this was front page news on the Guardian.
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.
Environuts and heartless green politicians see these deaths as a good thing, less money being spent by government on the elderly means more money for environmental crack pots and new age science. More debauchery for ExcelPhil and Slingherhook.
The Bias Broadcasting Comrades (aka BBC) has a most interesting propaganda post on their Newspeak website –
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/climateexperiment/whattheymean/theuk.shtml
Apparently it is supposed to be a teaching aid…
„The Met Office is calling a meeting of top scientists to look at the “urgent” question of whether the warming of the Arctic is affecting UK weather.” http://www.itv.com/news/update/2013-04-10/met-offices-urgent-inquiry-into-arctic-effect-on-uk-weather/
If MetOff what to talk about the cold March and April 2013, a look at NS & Baltic SST, far below average :
___e.g. 31. March http://www.ocean-climate-law.com/13/Arch/_b/9_9_15b.jpg
___e.g. 11. April http://climate-ocean.com/2013/b/9_4_2b.jpg
___ today (direct link) : http://ocean.dmi.dk/satellite/index.uk.php
may explain a lot to Met Office, and may even force them to consider human input, as the cold from Siberia, which Stefan Rahmstorf (28/29 March 2013) assumes, is not well founded, discussed here: http://www.ocean-climate-law.com/13/Arch/9_9.html ;
And the ITV/UK report here: http://climate-ocean.com/2013/9_4.html
Did it help them before?
Err is it they are not employing the TOP scientist? if not why are they “the MET” considered experts over there?
ITV wrote: “ Scientists want to investigate whether there is a link between these temperatures and the lowest ever Arctic ice levels, which were recorded a few months ago.”
For sure MetOff knows where the Arctic is, but nothing is said whether they have ever heard from the North Sea.
11. Apr. 2013 SST anomalies : http://climate-ocean.com/2013/b/9_4_3b_.jpg